Profile picture of Dr. Dr. M S Ganesh

Surgical Oncologist

fillstar iconfillstar iconfillstar iconfillstar iconhalfstar icon

4.5

Indian Flag

Dr. M S Ganesh

Icon representing available degree

MBBS, MCh - Surgical Oncology

Icon representing information registration no

100319 Karnataka Medical Council, 2013

Icon that representing available experience

39 Years Overall Experience

Icon representing available city of this doctor

Bangalore

Connect with Dr. M S Ganesh

Quick Appointment for Dr. M S Ganesh

OPD Timings of Dr. M S Ganesh

Services Offered by Dr. M S Ganesh

  • Cancer Surgery

  • Breast Cancer Management

  • Gynecological Cancer Treatment

  • Head and Neck Tumor / Cancer Surgery

  • Stem Cell Transplantation

  • Breast Cancer Treatment

  • Lung Cancer Treatment

  • Giant Cell tumour Treatment

  • Ewing's Sarcoma Treatment

  • Cancer Screening (Preventive)

  • Cytology Guided by Ultrasound

  • External Beam Radiation For Prostate Cancer

  • Chemotherapy

  • Brachytherapy (Internal Radiation Therapy)

About Of Dr. M S Ganesh

Dr. M S Ganesh is a highly experienced Surgical Oncologist with 38 years of overall experience, specializing in cancer surgery and management. He holds a degree in MBBS from Kurnool Medical College and MCh in Surgical Oncology from The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University.

Dr. Ganesh offers a wide range of services including Cancer Surgery, Breast Cancer Management, Gynecological Cancer Treatment, Head and Neck Tumor/Cancer Surgery, Stem Cell Transplantation, Lung Cancer Treatment, and more. He is known for his expertise in Giant Cell Tumor Treatment, Ewing's Sarcoma Treatment, Cancer Screening, Chemotherapy, and Brachytherapy.

From 1997 to 2017, Dr. Ganesh worked at Vydehi Cancer Center and currently serves as the Professor and Head of the Department of Surgical Oncology at Vydehi Oncology Institute in Bangalore. He has also worked at prestigious institutions like Cancer Institute, Adayar, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals Delhi, and Fortis Hospitals Delhi.

Dr. Ganesh is dedicated to providing comprehensive cancer treatment services, leveraging his vast experience and knowledge in cancer management. Patients trust him for his compassionate approach and effective communication skills, ensuring they feel informed and supported throughout their treatment journey.

To stay updated with the latest medical knowledge and research, Dr. Ganesh regularly attends conferences, workshops, and engages in continuous learning. He values collaboration with colleagues and other medical professionals, fostering a team-based approach to patient care for better outcomes.

Dr. Ganesh's work has positively impacted many patients' lives, offering them hope, comfort, and effective treatment options. His commitment to excellence and patient-centered care makes him a trusted and respected figure in the field of surgical oncology.

Education of Dr. M S Ganesh

  • MBBS - Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, 1986

  • MCh - Surgical Oncology - The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University (TNMGRMU), 1997

  • Fellow of the American College of Surgeons (FACS).

  • Diploma in Surgical Laparoscopy from the European Telesurgery Institute, Strasbourg, France.

Memberships of Dr. M S Ganesh

  • Karnataka Medical Council

  • European Society of Surgical Oncology

  • British Association of Head and Neck Oncologists

  • Indian Association of Surgical Oncology

  • European Head and Neck Society

  • Indian Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (National Council Member)

Experience of Dr. M S Ganesh

  • 1997 - 2017 Doctor at Vydehi cancer center

Registration No of Dr. M S Ganesh

  • 100319 Karnataka Medical Council, 2013

Publications by Dr. M S Ganesh

Abstract 5807: Differential T cell response to anti-PD1 in breast cancer Sub-types is driven by activity of intra-tumoral immune cells

Journal: American Association for Cancer Research Cancer Research
Year: April 2025
Authors: Mouniss MM, Biswajit Das, Kowshik Jaganathan, Syamkumar V, Moumita Nath, Chandan Bhowal, Dharanidharan M, Saikrishna S, Abdul Haseeb, Pallavi R, Kubera Chandran, Rajashekar M, Oliyarasi M, Méhul Kapur, Jayaprakash C, Venkatesh T, Ganesh MS, Amritha Prabha, Prakash BV, Ravi Krishnappa, Upendra K, Ritu Malhotra, Govindaraj K, Pavithira ., Mohit Malhotra, Nandini Pal Basak, Satish Sankaran

Description:Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) holds great promise for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), while it shows limited response hormone receptor positive (ER/PR+) breast cancer (CaBr). We employed the Farcast CaBr TruTumor histoculture platform, that preserves the native tumor microenvironment (TME), to study the role of tumor resident immune cell types in determining T cell activation levels on ICI treatment, in the two CaBr sub-types. Freshly resected tumor tissue samples along with matched blood were collected from consented patients. Tumor explants were generated and distributed into arms and cultured for 72 h. Media was replenished every 24 h and the supernatant was stored. The response to stimulation with anti-CD3 (100 ng/mL) + Interleukin-2 (IL-2, 100 IU/mL) and treatment with Nivolumab (132 µg/mL) was evaluated using cytokine release and flow cytometry based immune profiling. CaBr (n=115) samples had lower immune component than head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (n=113) (p<0.0001) but similar to ovarian (n=21) and renal cell (n=52) cancer prior to treatment with ICI. Amongst the two sub-types, immune component in TNBC (n=43) was higher than ER/PR+ subtypes (n=46) (p<0.05). TNBC (n=10) showed a greater proportion of lymphocyte (58.46%) compared to myeloid (39.21%) compartment. This bias was not observed in ER/PR+ samples (n=12). Anti-CD3+IL2 stimulation showed similar response between the two CaBr sub-types. Upon treatment with Nivolumab, 2 out of 4 TNBC samples exhibited a response phenotype, with >1.6-fold increase in CD8+GzmB+ cells and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release. In contrast, only 1 out of 4 ER/PR+ CaBr samples showed a modest increase of 1.3 fold for CD8+GzmB+ cells with no detectable IFN-γ release. To understand the basis for the differential response in the two sub-types, we studied in detail, one ER/PR+ (H1) and two TNBC (T1 and T2) samples, displaying varying levels of response. T2 and H1 did not show a Nivolumab response phenotype, whereas T1 demonstrated a strong T-cell reinvigoration and tumor cytotoxicity. Interestingly, all three samples showed anti-CD3+IL2 stimulation driven T cell response. tSNE analysis of CTLs in the control arm showed two distinct sub-populations of exhausted CTLs (CD8+PD1+). Population1 (Pop1) was Granzyme B-positive, while population2 (Pop2) was not. Upon anti-CD3 stimulation, Pop1 showed further increase of activation whereas Pop2 did not, indicative of Pop2 being an irreversibly exhausted T cell population. T2 notably had lower Pop1 and Pop2 CTLs, along with highest proportion of monocytes across all three samples pointing towards an immunosuppressive TME. H1 mainly contained over-exhausted Pop2 and negligible Pop1 CTLs. Interplay between different TME immune sub-types, thus influence response to Nivolumab in CaBr. This is effectively captured by the TruTumor platform. Citation Format Mouniss MM, Biswajit Das, Kowshik Jaganathan, Syamkumar V, Moumita Nath, Chandan Bhowal, Dharanidharan M, Saikrishna S, Abdul Haseeb, Pallavi R, Kubera Chandran, Rajashekar M, Oliyarasi M, Méhul Kapur, Jayaprakash C, Venkatesh T, Ganesh MS, Amritha Prabha, Prakash BV, Ravi Krishnappa, Upendra K, Ritu Malhotra, Govindaraj K, Pavithira ., Mohit Malhotra, Nandini Pal Basak, Satish Sankaran. Differential T cell response to anti-PD1 in breast cancer Sub-types is driven by activity of intra-tumoral immune cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 5807.

Adult intussusception: a systematic review of current literature

Journal: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Year: July 2024
Authors: Jithin T. Chand, Rakesh R, M. S. Ganesh

Description:Background Intussusception in adults is a rare condition characterized by a low incidence, which complicates the establishment of standardized management protocols unlike those readily available for pediatric cases. This study presents a case series from our institution alongside a systematic review of existing literature. The objective is to delineate effective management strategies for adult intussusception. Methods A systematic search of databases was conducted covering the period from January 2000 to May 2024. The study focused on adult patients diagnosed with intussusception either pre-operatively or intraoperatively and managed with either surgical intervention or conservative methods. The analysis also included retrospective review of patient records from our institution, specifically targeting individuals over 18 years of age, to determine the predominant types of intussusception and identify any pathological lead points associated with these cases. Results In our study, a total of 1,902 patients were included from 59 selected articles, with a mean age of 52.13 ± 14.95 years. Among them, 1,920 intussusceptions were diagnosed, with 98.3% of cases identified preoperatively. Computed tomography (CT) scan was the primary diagnostic modality used in 88.5% of cases. Abdominal pain was the predominant presenting symptom, observed in 86.23% of cases. Only 29 out of 1,920 cases underwent attempted reduction, while the majority required surgical resection due to the high incidence of malignancy in adult cases. The most common type of intussusception identified was colocolic (16.82%), followed by enteric (13.28%), ileocolic (4.89%), and ileocaecal (0.78%) types. A pathological lead point was observed in 302 out of 673 patients (44.84%), with a notably higher frequency of malignancy associated with colocolic intussusception. Conclusion Surgical management remains the cornerstone in treating adult intussusception, particularly in cases involving the colocolic type, where there is a significant risk of underlying malignancy. Attempts at reduction are generally avoided due to the potential risk of tumor dissemination, which could adversely impact patient outcomes. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen is pivotal for accurately diagnosing intussusceptions and guiding appropriate management strategies. It is imperative to adhere strictly to oncological principles during surgical interventions to ensure optimal patient care and outcomes.

Tumor histoculture captures the dynamic interactions between tumor and immune components in response to anti-PD1 in head and neck cancer

Journal: Springer Nature Nature Communications
Year: February 2024
Authors: Nandini Pal Basak, Kowshik Jaganathan, Biswajit Das, Oliyarasi Muthusamy, Rajashekar M, Ritu Malhotra, Amit Samal, Moumita Nath, Ganesh MS, Amritha Prabha Shankar, Prakash BV, Vijay Pillai, Manjula BV, Jayaprakash C, Vasanth K, Gowri Shankar K, Sindhu Govindan, Syamkumar V, Juby, Koushika R, Chandan Bhowal, Upendra Kumar, Govindaraj K, Mohit Malhotra, Satish Sankaran

Description:Dynamic interactions within the tumor micro-environment drive patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Existing preclinical models lack true representation of this complexity. Using a Head and Neck cancer patient derived TruTumor histoculture platform, the response spectrum of 70 patients to anti-PD1 treatment is investigated in this study. With a subset of 55 patient samples, multiple assays to characterize T-cell reinvigoration and tumor cytotoxicity are performed. Based on levels of these two response parameters, patients are stratified into five sub-cohorts, with the best responder and non-responder sub-cohorts falling at extreme ends of the spectrum. The responder sub-cohort exhibits high T-cell reinvigoration, high tumor cytotoxicity with T-cells homing into the tumor upon treatment whereas immune suppression and tumor progression pathways are pre-dominant in the non-responders. Some moderate responders benefit from combination of anti-CTLA4 with anti-PD1, which is evident from better cytotoxic T-cell: T-regulatory cell ratio and enhancement of tumor cytotoxicity. Baseline and on-treatment gene expression signatures from this study stratify responders and non-responders in unrelated clinical datasets.

Twenty-Seven Cases of Marjolins Ulcer; An Institutional Experience on Diagnosis, Treatment and Outcomes

Journal: Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology
Year: January 2024
Authors: Kiran Kumar BR, Amritha Prabha Shankar, Geeta S Narayanan, Ganesh M S

Description:Purpose: Marjolins ulcer is a malignant transformation that arises from chronic ulcers or previously traumatized scar that occur usually after burns. To study the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of Marjolins ulcer at our institute. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of all Marjolins ulcer patients presented to our department from 2018 to 2021 was done. A total of 27 patients of all age groups were included in the study. All the information regarding the diagnosis, treatment and outcome details were collected and analysed.Results: Most of the patients were in the 5th decade of life with an overall male preponderance. The most common cause for Marjolin ulcer was Burns Scar. The mean latency period for the development of Marjolins ulcer was 11 years. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological subtype. 18.5% patients received Adjuvant radiotherapy. At the median follow up of 14 months, one patient presented with locoregional relapse.Conclusion: Chronic non-ulcers that do not respond to treatment should be carefully examined by multidisciplinary team for malignant transformation. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and Adjuvant Radiotherapy should be considered in high-risk cases to reduce locoregional recurrence. Tumour size and nodal involvement are the main predictors of locoregional relapse.

Marjolins Ulcer: Clinicopathological Profile and Treatment Patterns

Journal: Journal of Analytical Oncology
Year: December 2023
Authors: B.R. Kiran Kumar, Geeta S. Narayanan, M.S. Ganesh, Amritha Prabha Shankar

Description:Purpose: Marjolins ulcer is a malignant transformation arising from chronic ulcers or previously traumatized scars that occur usually after burns. This article aims to study the clinicopathological profile and treatment patterns of Marjolins ulcer. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of all Marjolins ulcer patients presented to Vydehi Cancer Centre from 2018 to 2021 was done. A total of 27 patients of all age groups were included in the study. All information regarding detailed history, clinical examination, treatment details were retrospectively collected and analysed. Results: Most of the patients were in the 5th decade of life with an overall male preponderance. The most common cause for Marjolins ulcer was Burns scars followed by Trauma. Lower extremities were found to be the most predominant site. The mean latency period for the development of Marjolins ulcer was 11 years. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological subtype, Adjuvant Radiotherapy was given to the patients with high-risk features. Conclusion: Chronic non-healing ulcers that do not respond to treatment should be carefully examined for malignant transformation. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and Adjuvant Radiotherapy should be considered in high-risk cases to reduce locoregional recurrence.

Patient Reviews for Dr. M S Ganesh

Nandini Iyer

Dr. M S Ganesh is a compassionate Surgical Oncologist who explained my treatment plan clearly. I felt reassured under his care.

Arjun Rao

I am grateful to Dr. M S Ganesh for his expertise in surgical oncology. He performed my procedure with precision and I am recovering well.

Priya Sharma

Dr. M S Ganesh is a skilled Surgical Oncologist who showed genuine concern for my well-being. I highly recommend him for cancer care.

Rohan Patel

I had a positive experience with Dr. M S Ganesh. He is a knowledgeable Surgical Oncologist who guided me through my treatment journey.

Ayesha Khan

Dr. M S Ganesh is a dedicated Surgical Oncologist who provided me with personalized care. I am thankful for his expertise in cancer treatment.

Vikram Reddy

I was impressed by Dr. M S Ganesh's professionalism and attention to detail during my surgery. He is a top-notch Surgical Oncologist in Bangalore.

Meera Menon

Dr. M S Ganesh has a calming presence that put me at ease before my surgery. I appreciate his compassionate approach to patient care.

Sanjay Kumar

I had a positive outcome under the care of Dr. M S Ganesh, a skilled Surgical Oncologist. His expertise and support made a difference in my treatment.

Ananya Singh

Dr. M S Ganesh is a highly recommended Surgical Oncologist in Bangalore. His professionalism and expertise in cancer surgery are commendable.

Frequently Asked Questions About Dr. M S Ganesh

Who is Dr. M S Ganesh?

Dr. M S Ganesh is a highly respected specialist in the field of Surgical Oncologist, known for their extensive experience and contributions.

What are the OPD Timings of Dr. M S Ganesh?

The OPD timings of Dr. M S Ganesh are Saturday to Saturday from 09:00 AM to 11:00 AM.

What is the Clinic Location of Dr. M S Ganesh?

Dr. M S Ganesh's clinic is located in Bangalore.

What are Dr. M S Ganesh’s areas of specialization?

Dr. M S Ganesh specializes in Cancer Surgery, Breast Cancer Management, Gynecological Cancer Treatment, Head and Neck Tumor/Cancer Surgery, Stem Cell Transplantation, Breast Cancer Treatment, Lung Cancer Treatment, Giant Cell Tumour Treatment, Ewing's Sarcoma Treatment, Cancer Screening (Preventive), Cytology Guided by Ultrasound, External Beam Radiation For Prostate Cancer, Chemotherapy, and Brachytherapy (Internal Radiation Therapy).

Where does Dr. M S Ganesh practice?

Dr. M S Ganesh practices at Vydehi Cancer Center from 1997 to 2017.

What are Dr. M S Ganesh’s qualifications?

Dr. M S Ganesh holds the following qualifications: MBBS from Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, 1986, and MCh in Surgical Oncology from The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University (TNMGRMU), 1997.

What conditions does Dr. M S Ganesh specialize in treating as a Surgical Oncologist?

Dr. M S Ganesh specializes in treating various types of cancer through surgical interventions, such as breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and more.

What surgical procedures does Dr. M S Ganesh perform in the field of Surgical Oncology?

Dr. M S Ganesh performs a range of surgical procedures for cancer treatment, including tumor removal surgeries, lymph node dissections, and reconstructive surgeries post cancer removal.

How does Dr. M S Ganesh approach treatment planning for cancer patients?

Dr. M S Ganesh takes a multidisciplinary approach to treatment planning, collaborating with other specialists like medical oncologists and radiation oncologists to create personalized treatment plans for each patient.

What are some common concerns patients have before undergoing cancer surgery with Dr. M S Ganesh?

Common concerns patients may have before surgery include post-operative pain management, recovery time, potential side effects, and long-term outcomes of the surgical intervention.

Does Dr. M S Ganesh offer minimally invasive surgical options for cancer treatment?

Yes, Dr. M S Ganesh is experienced in performing minimally invasive surgical techniques such as laparoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted surgery to minimize scarring, reduce recovery time, and improve patient outcomes.

How can patients prepare for a consultation with Dr. M S Ganesh as a Surgical Oncologist?

Patients can prepare for a consultation by bringing their medical history, previous test results, list of current medications, and any questions or concerns they may have about their cancer diagnosis and treatment options.

More Surgical Oncologist Like Dr. M S Ganesh in Bangalore

Toparrow