Profile picture of Dr. Michael L. Friedlander

Oncologist

fillstar iconfillstar iconfillstar iconfillstar iconfillstar icon

5

Australian Flag

Michael L. Friedlander

Icon representing available degree

PhD, MBChB (Hons); FRACP; MRCP

Icon that representing available experience

50 Years Overall Experience

Icon representing available city of this doctor

Randwick

Connect with Michael L. Friedlander

Quick Appointment for Michael L. Friedlander

No OPD information available

Services Offered by Michael L. Friedlander

  • Ovarian Cancer

  • Breast Cancer

  • Ascites

  • BRCA Positive Breast Cancer

  • Endometrial Cancer

  • Menopause

  • Neurotoxicity Syndromes

  • Oophorectomy

  • Peripheral Neuropathy

  • Ring Chromosome 12

  • Salpingo-Oophorectomy

  • Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma

  • Anal Cancer

  • Breast Cancer in Men

  • Cervical Cancer

  • Febrile Neutropenia

  • Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)

  • Hysterectomy

  • Indigestion

  • Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor

  • Lung Metastases

  • Mastectomy

  • Melanoma

  • Mesothelioma

  • Prostate Cancer

  • Retinoblastoma

  • Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor

  • Spinocerebellar Degeneration and Corneal Dystrophy

  • Testicular Cancer

About Of Michael L. Friedlander

Michael L. Friedlander is a doctor who helps people with different types of cancer like ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. He also treats other health problems like menopause, indigestion, and nerve pain. Michael Friedlander is a man who has special skills in treating these conditions. He is good at communicating with his patients and they trust him because he listens to them and explains things clearly.

Michael Friedlander stays updated with the latest medical knowledge by reading research studies and attending conferences. He works well with other doctors and healthcare professionals to give the best care to his patients. His colleagues respect him for his expertise and dedication to helping people.

One way Michael Friedlander has helped patients is by publishing a study on how to manage certain types of ovarian and testicular tumors. He is also involved in a clinical trial to test a new treatment for advanced cancer. This shows that he is always looking for better ways to help his patients and improve their health.

In summary, Michael L. Friedlander is a caring and skilled doctor who specializes in treating cancer and other health issues. He keeps learning new things to provide the best care possible for his patients. His work has made a positive impact on many people's lives, and he continues to strive for better treatments through research and clinical trials.

Education of Michael L. Friedlander

  • MBChB (Hons) – Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery Honours; University of Birmingham, UK; 1975

  • MRCP – Member of the Royal College of Physicians (London); Royal College of Physicians, UK; 1978

  • FRACP – Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians; Australia / New Zealand; 1984

  • PhD – Doctor of Philosophy;

Memberships of Michael L. Friedlander

  • Royal College of Physicians, London

  • Royal Australasian College of Physicians

  • Prince of Wales Cancer Centre / Prince of Wales Hospital & The Royal Hospital for Women

  • International Society of Gynaecological Oncology (IGCS)

  • ANZGOG (Australia & New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group)

  • ANZBCTG (Australia & New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group)

  • Australia (AM) – for service to medicine, especially oncology

Publications by Michael L. Friedlander

Controversies in the management of ovarian granulosa cell and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors.

Journal: International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society

Year: November 21, 2024

Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors are rare and include adult granulosa cell tumors, juvenile granulosa cell tumors, and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors. Adult granulosa cell tumors the most prevalent malignant ovarian sex cord stromal tumors are the focus of the review which synthesizes published data to highlight the diagnostic challenges and the controversies surrounding the management of adult granulosa cell tumors, juvenile granulosa cell tumors, and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors. Adult granulosa cell tumors have frequently been misdiagnosed, with up to 30% of cases reassigned after a contemporary review of historical cases, which could affect the interpretation of older studies. Diagnostic accuracy improved in 2009 following the identification of a somatic FOXL2 c.402C>G missense point in almost all adult granulosa cell tumors. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment at diagnosis and recurrence, and fertility-sparing surgery is recommended for younger patients with stage 1 ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I high-risk adult granulosa and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors remains controversial, with guidelines providing varied and conflicting recommendations based on limited evidence. Surveillance strategies, including the frequency of follow-up, duration of surveillance, sensitivity, and specificity of tumor markers, and the timing and nature of imaging, are debatable. We reviewed the evolution of systemic therapy for ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors over the last 4 decades and raised questions regarding the choice of chemotherapy regimens and evidence to support adjuvant chemotherapy. The efficacy of endocrine therapy in adult granulosa cell tumors is contentious, and most studies are retrospective with variable criteria to define response and clinical benefit. The available data are discussed, including trials in progress. In conclusion, the management of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors requires a nuanced understanding of their unique pathologic and biological characteristics and an appreciation of the limitations of the existing evidence. There is a high priority to encourage international collaboration through prospective data collection and randomized trials to provide the required evidence to support treatment guidelines and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Primary Analysis of EPIK-O/ENGOT-ov61: Alpelisib Plus Olaparib Versus Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant or Platinum-Refractory High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Without BRCA Mutation.

Journal: Journal Of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal Of The American Society Of Clinical Oncology

Year: July 23, 2025

Objective: Patients with platinum-resistant/platinum-refractory high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) without a BRCA mutation have poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We report efficacy and biomarker data from EPIK-O, which investigated alpelisib + olaparib versus single-agent chemotherapy in these patients. Methods: EPIK-O was an open-label, phase III trial that randomly assigned patients with platinum-resistant/platinum-refractory HGSOC with no germline or known somatic BRCA mutation 1:1 to alpelisib 200 mg once daily + olaparib 200 mg twice daily or treatment of physician's choice (TPC; paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 once weekly or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40-50 mg/m2 once every 28 days). Patients had 1-3 previous systemic therapies. Previous bevacizumab was required (unless contraindicated); previous poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors were allowed. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 (blinded independent review committee [BIRC]). Secondary efficacy end points included overall response rate (ORR; per BIRC), duration of response (per BIRC), and overall survival (OS; key secondary end point). Results: A total of 358 patients (alpelisib + olaparib [n = 180], TPC [n = 178]) were included. The median follow-up time was 9.3 months. At data cutoff (April 21, 2023), 33 (18.3%) and 30 (16.9%) patients remained on treatment with alpelisib + olaparib and TPC, respectively. The median PFS (BIRC) was 3.6 versus 3.9 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.48]; one-sided P = .84) for alpelisib + olaparib versus TPC. The ORR was 15.6% (95% CI, 10.6% to 21.7%) versus 13.5% (95% CI, 8.8% to 19.4%). The median OS was 10.0 versus 10.6 months (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.71). The safety profile of alpelisib + olaparib was consistent with that observed for the individual agents. Conclusions: The primary objective, PFS improvement, was not met in EPIK-O. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed. Biomarker analyses provided new insights for responders to alpelisib + olaparib.

Veliparib concomitant with first-line chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer: Final overall survival and disease-related symptoms results.

Journal: European Journal Of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)

Year: April 04, 2025

Background: In the VELIA trial, the addition of veliparib to standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and continued as maintenance resulted in significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) compared with carboplatin plus paclitaxel induction therapy alone (23.5 vs 17.3 months; p < 0.001) in patients with ovarian cancer. We now report final overall survival (OS) and updated safety and disease-related symptoms (DRS) from patient-reported outcomes of the trial. Methods: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study enrolled adult women with an initial diagnosis of stage III/IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer undergoing primary or interval cytoreductive surgery. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to chemotherapy plus veliparib followed by veliparib maintenance (veliparib-throughout), chemotherapy plus veliparib followed by placebo maintenance (veliparib-combination-only), or chemotherapy plus placebo followed by placebo maintenance (placebo-throughout). PFS was the primary endpoint; OS and DRS were secondary endpoints. Results: In the intention-to-treat population (N = 1140), median OS was 59.2 months (95 % confidence interval: 52.1, 68.2) for the veliparib-throughout group, 58.0 (50.6, 64.1) months for veliparib-combination-only, and 57.8 (52.3, 63.8) months for placebo-throughout. OS outcomes were not significantly different between arms overall or in the BRCA-deficient and homologous recombination-deficient cohorts. No new safety signals were identified during the longer follow-up period and DRS analyses indicated there was no significant additional symptom-related burden overall when veliparib was added to chemotherapy or used for maintenance. Conclusions: No OS or DRS benefit of addition of veliparib to platinum-based chemotherapy and continued as maintenance therapy was detected in this study, despite an observed benefit over chemotherapy alone in PFS.

Under the radar-frequency, timing, duration and trajectory of lower grade adverse events in clinical trials of anti-cancer therapies.

Journal: The Oncologist

Year: March 10, 2025

The current methods to capture and report adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials were developed in the era of cytotoxic chemotherapy and typically focused on higher grade AEs which may lead to severe harms. However, current cancer therapies including targeted agents, checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody drug conjugates are commonly administered for a prolonged duration and result in a cumulative symptom burden which may be inadequately reflected by the conventional approach to capture and reporting of AEs. The limitations include underestimating the chronic AE burden associated with extended exposure, particularly for low to moderate grade symptomatic AEs, and reporting methods that make comparison of similar treatments challenging. Furthermore, the specific AEs that may impact on treatment adherence and lead to dose modifications with oral self-administered therapy are not typically reported. To address these limitations, we recommend: (1) a standardized approach to collection and reporting of patient reported AE data for symptomatic AEs, and reporting methods that incorporate information on the longitudinal characteristics of AEs including duration and trajectory; (2) accurately capturing adherence to oral agents; (3) transparent reporting of the AEs that result in dose reduction and treatment discontinuation in trials; (4) adoption of universal structured AE capture and reporting to allow meaningful comparison of the tolerability profile of therapies. As treatment options increase, optimizing capture and reporting of AEs to include lower grade yet troublesome AEs is essential to provide meaningful information on treatment tolerability to inform both clinicians and patients.

Durvalumab versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (MOCCA/APGOT-OV2/GCGS-OV3): a multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial.

Journal: Clinical Cancer Research : An Official Journal Of The American Association For Cancer Research

Year: January 16, 2025

Objective: The optimal treatment of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (rOCCC) remains unknown. This is the first randomized trial to compare durvalumab with chemotherapy in rOCCC. Methods: MOCCA is a randomized, phase 2 trial conducted in Singapore, Korea and Australia. Eligible patients had rOCCC with recurrence after platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG performance status ≤2 and no prior immune checkpoint blockade. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to durvalumab (1500mg every 4 weeks) or chemotherapy. Patients progressing on chemotherapy were allowed to crossover to durvalumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORR), and safety. Results: 48 eligible women were assigned to durvalumab (N= 31) or chemotherapy (N= 17). Median PFS was 7.6 (95% CI 7.0-16.0) and 14.0 (95% CI 7.0-32.9) weeks with durvalumab or chemotherapy, (HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8-3.0; P= 0.92). Median OS was 37.9 (95% CI 21.7-143.0) and 40.6 (95% CI 25.0-not reached) weeks, respectively (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.7-3.3; P= 0.85). The difference in ORR between groups was not statistically significant (durvalumab 9.7% vs PCC 18.8%; difference -9.1%, 95% CI -31.3%-12.9%; P= 0.83). Fewer all-grade (35.5% vs 68.8%) and high-grade (9.7% vs 31.3%) treatment-related adverse events were observed for durvalumab. PD-L1 CPS+ was observed in 28.9% (CPS≥1%) and 10.5% (CPS≥10%) of patients. PIK3CA mutations were associated with time to progression on durvalumab ³12 weeks (RR(-mutated vs -wildtype) 2.83, 95% CI 1.16 to 14.17). Conclusions: Durvalumab was well-tolerated, but did not improve efficacy outcomes compared with chemotherapy in rOCCC.

Clinical Trials by Michael L. Friedlander

A Phase 1b, Open-Label, Dose-escalation and Expansion Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Antitumor Activities of a RAF Dimer Inhibitor BGB-283 in Combination With MEK Inhibitor PD-0325901 in Patients With Advanced or Refractory Solid Tumors

Enrollment Status: Active not recruiting

Published: March 14, 2025

Intervention Type: Drug

Study Drug:

Study Phase: Phase 1

A Retrospective/Prospective Analysis of Characterization of the Long-Term Responders on Olaparib in Solid Tumours

Enrollment Status: Completed

Published: January 10, 2023

Intervention Type:

Study Drug:

Study Phase:

A Phase 2 Study of Prexasertib in Platinum-Resistant or Refractory Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Enrollment Status: Completed

Published: August 19, 2022

Intervention Type: Drug

Study Drug: Prexasertib

Study Phase: Phase 2

A Phase 1/1b, Open Label, Multiple Dose, Dose Escalation and Expansion Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Antitumor Activity of the Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody BGB-A317 in Combination With the PARP Inhibitor BGB-290 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors

Enrollment Status: Completed

Published: December 06, 2021

Intervention Type: Biological, Drug

Study Drug:

Study Phase: Phase 1

A Phase II, Signal-Seeking Trial of the Clinical Benefit Rate Associated With Pamiparib in Subjects With Germline or Somatic BRCA1/2 High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer or Carcinosarcoma Who Have Progressed on P-gp Substrate Chemotherapy or PARPi With the Presence of an ABCB1 Fusion and the Absence of a BRCA1/2 Reversion

Enrollment Status: Withdrawn

Published: August 10, 2021

Intervention Type: Drug

Study Drug: Pamiparib

Study Phase: Phase 2

Patient Reviews for Michael L. Friedlander

Sarah O'Connor

Dr. Friedlander is an amazing Oncologist who truly cares about his patients. He explained everything clearly and made me feel at ease throughout my treatment.

Liam Murphy

I am so grateful for Dr. Friedlander's expertise and compassion during my cancer journey. He is a top-notch Oncologist who goes above and beyond for his patients.

Sienna Byrne

Dr. Friedlander is a wonderful Oncologist who is not only knowledgeable but also very kind. I felt supported and well taken care of under his care.

Declan Kelly

I highly recommend Dr. Friedlander as an Oncologist. He is a true professional who always puts his patients first. I am thankful for his excellent care.

Aoife Doyle

Dr. Friedlander is a fantastic Oncologist who helped me navigate through a difficult time with grace and expertise. I couldn't have asked for a better doctor.

Finn O'Sullivan

I am extremely impressed with Dr. Friedlander's dedication and knowledge as an Oncologist. He provided me with excellent care and support throughout my treatment.

Maeve Ryan

Dr. Friedlander is a remarkable Oncologist who truly listens to his patients and provides personalized care. I am so grateful for his expertise and compassion.

Frequently Asked Questions About Michael L. Friedlander

What conditions does Michael L. Friedlander specialize in treating as an oncologist?

Michael L. Friedlander specializes in treating various types of cancer, including but not limited to breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer.

What treatment options does Michael L. Friedlander offer for cancer patients?

Michael L. Friedlander offers a comprehensive range of treatment options for cancer patients, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and precision medicine.

How does Michael L. Friedlander approach personalized care for cancer patients?

Michael L. Friedlander believes in personalized care for each cancer patient, tailoring treatment plans based on the individual's specific cancer type, stage, and overall health condition.

What supportive care services does Michael L. Friedlander provide for cancer patients?

In addition to cancer treatment, Michael L. Friedlander offers supportive care services such as pain management, palliative care, nutritional counseling, and emotional support to enhance the overall well-being of cancer patients.

How does Michael L. Friedlander stay updated on the latest advancements in oncology?

Michael L. Friedlander is actively involved in research and clinical trials to stay informed about the latest advancements in oncology, ensuring that patients receive cutting-edge treatments and care.

What can patients expect during their initial consultation with Michael L. Friedlander?

During the initial consultation, patients can expect a thorough evaluation of their medical history, discussion of their diagnosis, treatment options, and personalized care plan tailored to their specific needs and preferences.

More Oncologist Like Michael L. Friedlander in Randwick

Toparrow