Ian N. Glaspole

Objective: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic progressive lung disease with a poor prognosis. Antifibrotics slow the decline of pulmonary function after 12-months, but limited studies have examined the role of circulatory biomarkers in antifibrotic treated IPF patients. Methods: Serum from 98 IPF participants, from the Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry were collected at four time-points over 1 year post-antifibrotic treatment and analysed as two separate cohorts. Patients were stratified as progressive, if they experienced ≥ 10% decline in FVC or ≥ 15% decline in DLCO or were deceased within 1 year of treatment initiation: or otherwise as stable. Ten molecules of interest were measured by ELISAs in patient serum. Results: Baseline MMP7 levels were higher in progressive than stable patients in Cohort 1 (p = 0.02) and Cohort 2 (p = 0.0002). Baseline MMP7 levels also best differentiated progressive from stable patients (Cohort 1, AUC = 0.74, p = 0.02; Cohort 2, AUC = 0.81, p = 0.0003). Regression analysis of the combined cohort showed that elevated MMP7 levels predicted 12-month progression (OR = 1.530, p = 0.010) and increased risk of overall mortality (HR = 1.268, p = 0.002). LASSO regression identified a multi-biomarker panel (MMP7, ICAM-1, CHI3L1, CA125) that differentiated progression more accurately than MMP7 alone. Furthermore, GAP combined with MMP7, ICAM-1, CCL18 and SP-D was more predictive of 3-year mortality than GAP alone. Conclusions: MMP7 along with a multi-biomarker and GAP panel can predict IPF progression and mortality, with the potential for optimising management.

Suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients may be referred to an ILD-specialist centre or a non-ILD-specialist centre for diagnosis and treatment. Early referral and management of patients at ILD-specialist centres has been shown to improve survival and reduce hospitalisations. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the ILD patient diagnostic pathway and prompted centres to adapt. This study investigates and contrasts ILD patient pathways in ILD-specialist and non-ILD-specialist centres, focusing on referrals, caseloads, diagnostic tools, multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting practices and resource accessibility. Conducted as a cross-sectional study, a global self-selecting survey ran from September 2022 to January 2023. Participants included ILD specialists and healthcare professionals (HCPs) from ILD-specialist centres and non-ILD-specialist centres. Of 363 unique respondents from 64 countries, 259 were from ILD-specialist centres and 104 from non-ILD-specialist centres. ILD centres had better resource availability, exhibiting higher utilisation of diagnostic tests (median: 12 tests) than non-ILD centres (nine tests) and better access to specialist professions attending MDT meetings (median: six professions at meeting) in specialist centres than non-ILD centres (three professions at meeting). Transitioning to virtual MDT meetings allowed HCPs from other locations to join meetings in nearly 90% of all centres, increasing regular participation in 60% of specialist centres and 72% of non-ILD centres. For treatment of patients, specialist centres had better access to antifibrotic drugs (91%) compared to non-ILD centres (60%). Diagnostic pathways for ILD patients diverged between specialist centres and non-ILD centres. Disparities in resource and specialist availability existed between centres.

Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome is a rare genetic cause of pulmonary fibrosis, associated with albinism, nystagmus, and a bleeding diathesis. Histologically, Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome Pulmonary Fibrosis (HPS-PF) typically resembles usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), however radiologically this is not always the case with a range of features described in the current literature. HPS-PF typically occurs earlier in life than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and there is limited evidence to support the use of antifibrotic therapy. Given the rarity and potential clinical outcomes of the disease, further research is required. This may be aided by the inclusion of patient with HPS-PF in registry databases.

Objective: Digital technologies offer opportunities for remote monitoring, increased patient engagement and incorporation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into interstitial lung disease (ILD) care and research. This study evaluated the usability and patient experience of the RE-BUILD (Registry for Better Understanding of ILD) application, an ILD-specific smartphone app. Methods: Patients with ILD aged ≥18 years were recruited from three tertiary ILD centres to use the RE-BUILD app for 6 months. The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) was evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months and patients received monthly prompts to enter clinical and PROM data. Qualitative interviews regarding patient experience were performed in a subset of 10. Results: Fifty patients, with mean age 66.9 ± 10.3 years, 25 (50%) female were included. Participants used the app for a median of 48 (IQR 21-178.3) sessions, equivalent to 8 sessions (IQR 3.5-29.71) per month. Median number of days that the app was accessed was 37 (IQR 14-96.8), with 13 (26%) patients using the app >30 times per month. The most accessed app feature was physical activity, followed by 'air quality'. Participants agreed or strongly agreed that the app was easy to use (76.0%) easy to learn to use (79.8%) and well-organized with accessible information (74.8%). The median overall MAUQ score for usability was 5.69 (IQR 5.03-6.19). There was also a high rate of engagement with app functionalities. Conclusions: RE-BUILD is a usable and intuitive platform for self-monitoring and data collection in ILD. Patients report a high degree of satisfaction and have provided valuable feedback for its further development.

Background: Predicting shorter life expectancy is crucial for prioritizing antifibrotic therapy in fibrotic lung diseases, where progression varies widely, from stability to rapid deterioration. This heterogeneity complicates treatment decisions, emphasizing the need for reliable baseline measures. This study focuses on leveraging artificial intelligence model to address heterogeneity in disease outcomes, focusing on mortality as the ultimate measure of disease trajectory. Methods: This retrospective study included 1744 anonymised patients who underwent high-resolution CT scanning. The AI model, SABRE (Smart Airway Biomarker Recognition Engine), was developed using data from patients with various lung diseases (n=460, including lung cancer, pneumonia, emphysema, and fibrosis). Then, 1284 high-resolution CT scans with evidence of diffuse FLD from the Australian IPF Registry and OSIC were used for clinical analyses. Airway branches were categorized and quantified by anatomic structures and volumes, followed by multivariable analysis to explore the associations between these categories and patients' progression and mortality, adjusting for disease severity or traditional measurements. Results: Cox regression identified SABRE-based variables as independent predictors of mortality and progression, even adjusting for disease severity (fibrosis extent, traction bronchiectasis extent, and ILD extent), traditional measures (FVC%, DLCO%, and CPI), and previously reported deep learning algorithms for fibrosis quantification and morphological analysis. Combining SABRE with DLCO significantly improved prognosis utility, yielding an AUC of 0.852 at the first year and a C-index of 0.752. Conclusions: SABRE-based variables capture prognostic signals beyond that provided by traditional measurements, disease severity scores, and established AI-based methods, reflecting the progressiveness and pathogenesis of the disease.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Pamrevlumab in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)