Profile picture of Dr. Graham G. Giles

Oncologist

Australian Flag

Graham G. Giles

Icon representing available degree

PhD, MSc, BSc

Icon that representing available experience

45 Years Overall Experience

Icon representing available city of this doctor

Melbourne

Connect with Graham G. Giles

Quick Appointment for Graham G. Giles

No OPD information available

Services Offered by Graham G. Giles

  • Breast Cancer

  • Colorectal Cancer

  • Familial Colorectal Cancer

  • Familial Prostate Cancer

  • Lynch Syndrome

  • Menopause

  • Obesity

  • Prostate Cancer

  • Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD)

  • Anal Cancer

  • Arthritis

  • Asthma

  • B-Cell Lymphoma

  • Endometrial Cancer

  • Follicular Lymphoma

  • Hemochromatosis

  • Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)

  • Late-Onset Retinal Degeneration

  • Lung Cancer

  • Multiple Myeloma

  • Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

  • Oophorectomy

  • Osteoarthritis

  • Ovarian Cancer

  • Pancreatic Cancer

  • Premature Ovarian Failure

  • Prostatectomy

  • Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

  • Ring Chromosome 12

  • Ring Chromosome 6

  • Tendinitis

  • Abdominal Obesity Metabolic Syndrome

  • Acoustic Neuroma

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig's Disease)

  • Astrocytoma

  • Atopic Dermatitis

  • Autosomal Recessive Hypotrichosis

  • Barrett Esophagus

  • Bladder Cancer

  • Bone Tumor

  • Brain Tumor

  • Bronchitis

  • Calcinosis

  • Cholangiocarcinoma (Bile Duct Cancer)

  • Chronic B-Cell Leukemia (CBCL)

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

  • Congenital Aplastic Anemia

  • Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

  • Endometriosis

  • Fanconi Anemia

  • Gallbladder Cancer

  • Gallbladder Disease

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

  • Geographic Atrophy

  • Glioblastoma

  • Glioma

  • Gliomatosis Cerebri

  • Helicobacter Pylori Infection

  • Hip Replacement

  • Hypertension

  • Knee Replacement

  • Leukemia

  • Liver Spots

  • Measles

  • Melanoma

  • Melasma

  • Meningioma

  • Metabolic Syndrome

  • Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)

  • Mosaicism

  • Nephrectomy

  • Neuroendocrine Tumor

  • Osteoporosis

  • Osteosarcoma

  • Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

  • Parainfluenza

  • Pleurisy

  • Primary Lateral Sclerosis

  • Schwannoma

  • Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

  • Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL)

  • Stomach Cancer

  • Stridor

  • Sunburn

  • Thyroid Cancer

  • Turcot Syndrome

  • Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)

  • Urothelial Cancer

About Of Graham G. Giles

Graham G. Giles is a male healthcare provider who helps patients with various health issues like breast cancer, prostate cancer, obesity, arthritis, asthma, and many others. He is skilled in treating conditions like Lynch syndrome, menopause, and lung cancer.

Graham G. Giles communicates effectively with patients, listening to their concerns and providing clear explanations about their health. Patients trust him because he is knowledgeable, caring, and dedicated to helping them feel better.

To stay updated with the latest medical knowledge, Graham G. Giles regularly attends conferences, reads research articles, and collaborates with other experts in the field. This ensures that he can offer the best possible care to his patients.

Graham G. Giles works closely with colleagues and other medical professionals to provide comprehensive care to patients. He values teamwork and believes that by working together, they can achieve better outcomes for those in need of medical assistance.

Through his work, Graham G. Giles has positively impacted the lives and health of many patients. His dedication to providing high-quality care and his commitment to staying informed about the latest advancements in medicine have helped improve the well-being of those he treats.

One of Graham G. Giles's notable publications is "Evaluation of agreement between common clustering strategies for DNA methylation-based subtyping of breast tumors" in Epigenomics. This research showcases his expertise in the field and his contributions to advancing medical knowledge.

Overall, Graham G. Giles is a compassionate and knowledgeable healthcare provider who is dedicated to helping patients improve their health and well-being. His commitment to staying informed, collaborating with colleagues, and providing excellent care makes him a trusted and respected medical professional in his field.

Education of Graham G. Giles

  • PhD; University of Tasmania; 1980

Memberships of Graham G. Giles

  • AM - Member of the Order of Australia

  • Fellow (Honorary) at Cancer Council Victoria

  • Australasian Epidemiological Association (AEA)

  • International Epidemiological Association (IEA))

Publications by Graham G. Giles

Evaluation of agreement between common clustering strategies for DNA methylation-based subtyping of breast tumours.

Journal: Epigenomics
Year: December 23, 2024
Authors: Elaheh Zarean, Shuai Li, Ee Wong, Enes Makalic, Roger Milne, Graham Giles, Catriona Mclean, Melissa Southey, Pierre-antoine Dugué

Description:Clustering algorithms have been widely applied to tumor DNA methylation datasets to define methylation-based cancer subtypes. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between subtypes obtained from common clustering strategies. We used tumor DNA methylation data from 409 women with breast cancer from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS) and 781 breast tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Agreement was assessed using the adjusted Rand index for various combinations of number of CpGs, number of clusters and clustering algorithms (hierarchical, K-means, partitioning around medoids, and recursively partitioned mixture models). Inconsistent agreement patterns were observed for between-algorithm and within-algorithm comparisons, with generally poor to moderate agreement (ARI <0.7). Results were qualitatively similar in the MCCS and TCGA, showing better agreement for moderate number of CpGs and fewer clusters (K = 2). Restricting the analysis to CpGs that were differentially-methylated between tumor and normal tissue did not result in higher agreement. Our study highlights that common clustering strategies involving an arbitrary choice of algorithm, number of clusters and number of methylation sites are likely to identify different DNA methylation-based breast tumor subtypes.

GWAS meta-analysis identifies five susceptibility loci for endometrial cancer.

Journal: EBioMedicine
Year: January 23, 2025
Authors: Dhanya Ramachandran, Xuemin Wang, Triin Laisk, Ying Zheng, Nathan Ingold, Daffodil Canson, Pik Kho, Bianca Naumann, Carly Chapman, Kristine Bousset, Anna Krause, Peter Schürmann, Britta Wieland, Patricia Hanel, Fabienne Hülse, Norman Häfner, Ingo Runnebaum, Natalia Dubrowinskaja, Nurzhan Turmanov, Tatyana Yugay, Zura Yessimsiitova, Frédéric Amant, Daniela Annibali, Matthias Beckmann, Clara Bodelon, Daniel Buchanan, Chu Chen, Megan Clarke, Linda Cook, Immaculata De Vivo, Wout De Wispelaere, Mengmeng Du, Douglas Easton, Julius Emons, Peter Fasching, Christine Friedenreich, Grace Gallagher, Graham Giles, Ellen Goode, Holly Harris, David Hunter, David Kolin, Peter Kraft, James Lacey, Diether Lambrechts, Lingeng Lu, George Mutter, Jeffin Naduparambil, Kelli O'connell, Alpa Patel, Paul D Pharoah, Timothy Rebbeck, Fulvio Ricceri, Harvey Risch, Matthias Ruebner, Carlotta Sacerdote, Rodney Scott, V Setiawan, Xiao-ou Shu, Melissa Southey, Emma Tham, Ian Tomlinson, Constance Turman, Nicolas Wentzensen, Wanghong Xu, Herbert Yu, Wei Zheng, Amanda Spurdle, Yosef Yarden, Peter Hillemanns, Dylan Glubb, Thilo Dörk, Tracy O'mara

Description:Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in high-income countries. In addition to environmental risk factors, genetic predisposition contributes towards endometrial cancer development but is still incompletely defined. Methods: Building on genome-wide association studies (GWASs) by the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium, we conducted a GWAS meta-analysis of 17,278 endometrial cancer cases and 289,180 controls, incorporating biobank samples from the UK, Finland, Estonia and Japan. Results: GWAS analysis identified five additional risk loci (3p25.2, 3q25.2, 6q22.31, 12q21.2, and 17q24.2). Corresponding gene-based analyses supported findings for three of the five loci, at NAV3 (12q21.2), PPARG (3p25.2), and BPTF (17q24.2), as well as two additional candidate risk regions at ATF7IP2 (16p13.2-p13.13) and RPP21 (6p22.1). Validation genotyping in further independent case-control series replicated the most significant locus at 12q21.2 and corroborated risk variants located intronic to NAV3, the gene for Neuron Navigator 3. Downregulation of NAV3 in endometrial cell lines accelerated cell division and wound healing capacity whereas NAV3 overexpression reduced cell survival and increased cell death, indicating that NAV3 acts as a tumour suppressor in endometrial cells. Conclusions: Our large study extends the number of genome-wide significant risk loci identified for endometrial carcinoma by about one-third and proposes a role of NAV3 as a tumour suppressor in this common cancer. Background: This study was mainly supported by funding from the Wilhelm Sander Foundation, Germany, and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia. A complete list of funding organisations is provided in the acknowledgements.

Allergic disease and risk of multiple myeloma: A case-control study.

Journal: Cancer Epidemiology
Year: December 22, 2024
Authors: Simon Cheah, Adrian Lowe, Nina Afshar, Julie Bassett, Fiona Bruinsma, Wendy Cozen, Simon Harrison, John Hopper, Harindra Jayasekara, H Prince, Claire Vajdic, Nicole Doo, Graham Giles, Shyamali Dharmage, Roger Milne

Description:Objective: Multiple myeloma (MM) is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, yet our knowledge regarding MM aetiology remains limited. We investigated whether a history of allergic conditions is associated with MM risk. Methods: Incident cases (n = 782) of MM were recruited via cancer registries in Victoria and NSW. Controls (n = 733) were siblings (n = 436) or spouses (n = 297) of cases. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for associations between self-reported allergic conditions (asthma, eczema, food allergy, hay fever) and MM risk. Results: Eczema was inversely associated with MM risk (OR = 0.54, 95 %CI = 0.42-0.70), as was a combined history of food allergy and eczema (OR = 0.52, 95 %CI = 0.29-0.93). There was an inverse association between a history of any allergic condition (compared with none) and risk of MM (OR = 0.68, 95 %CI = 0.55-0.84). In the mean-centred dose-risk analysis the OR was 0.87 (95 %CI = 0.73-1.04) per additional allergic condition of interest. No notable associations were identified for food allergy, asthma, or hay fever alone. Conclusions: We found that a history of allergic disease, particularly eczema, was associated with reduced MM risk. Further research is recommended to confirm findings and investigate potential mechanisms.

Hormone therapy use and young-onset breast cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts included in the Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.

Journal: The Lancet. Oncology
Year: December 04, 2024
Authors: Katie O'brien, Melissa House, Mandy Goldberg, Michael Jones, Clarice Weinberg, Amy De Gonzalez, Kimberly Bertrand, William Blot, Jessica Dehart, Fergus Couch, Montserrat Garcia Closas, Graham Giles, Victoria Kirsh, Cari Kitahara, Woon-puay Koh, Hannah Park, Roger Milne, Julie Palmer, Alpa Patel, Thomas Rohan, Minouk Schoemaker, Anthony Swerdlow, Lauren Teras, Celine Vachon, Kala Visvanathan, Jian-min Yuan, Wei Zheng, Hazel Nichols, Dale Sandler

Description:Background: Oestrogen plus progestin hormone therapy is an established risk factor for breast cancer in postmenopausal women. We examined the less well-studied association between exogenous hormones and breast cancer in young women, who might use hormone therapy after gynaecological surgery or to relieve perimenopausal symptoms. Methods: In this pooled cohort analysis, we investigated the relationship between exogenous hormones and breast cancer in young women using data from 10-13 prospective cohorts from North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. The participating cohorts followed up women for incident breast cancer until age 55 years. We used cohort-stratified, multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for associations of hormone therapy with incident young-onset breast cancer. We also estimated risk differences based on cumulative risk until age 55 years. Results: We included 459 476 women aged 16-54 years (mean 42·0 years [IQR 35·5-49·2]), of whom 8455 (2%) developed young-onset breast cancer (diagnosed before age 55 years; median follow-up 7·8 years [5·2-11·2]). Overall, 15% of participants reported using hormone therapy, with oestrogen plus progestin hormone therapy (6%) and unopposed oestrogen (5%) being the most common types. Cumulative risk of young-onset breast cancer was 4·1% in non-users. Hormone therapy of any type was not associated with incident young-onset breast cancer (HR 0·96 [95% CI 0·88 to 1·04]), but ever oestrogen hormone therapy use was inversely associated (0·86 [0·75 to 0·98]; risk difference -0·5% [-1·0 to -0·0]). The HR for ever oestrogen plus progestin hormone therapy and young-onset breast cancer was 1·10 (0·98 to 1·24), with positive associations observed for long-term use (1·18 [1·01 to 1·38] for >2 years) and use among women without hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy (1·15 [1·02 to 1·31]). Oestrogen hormone therapy and young-onset breast cancer association was similar for all breast cancer subtypes, but oestrogen plus progestin hormone therapy was more strongly associated with oestrogen receptor negative (1·44 [1·11 to 1·88]) and triple-negative disease (1·50 [1·02 to 2·20]) than with other subtypes. Conclusions: Oestrogen hormone therapy use was inversely associated with young-onset breast cancer, and oestrogen plus progestin hormone therapy was associated with higher young-onset breast cancer incidence among women with intact uterus and ovaries. These findings largely parallel results from studies of hormone use and later-onset breast cancer and provide novel evidence for establishing clinical recommendations among younger women. Background: NIH Intramural Research Program.

Smart Nonuniformity for Calibrating Sequencing Depth of a Targeted Gene Panel to Simultaneously Detect Somatic and Germline Variants.

Journal: The Journal Of Molecular Diagnostics : JMD
Year: October 24, 2024
Authors: Robert O'reilly, Philip Harraka, Jared Burke, Daniele Belluoccio, Paul Yeh, Kerryn Howlett, Kiarash Behrouzfar, Amanda Rewse, Helen Tsimiklis, Graham Giles, John Hopper, Kristen Bubb, Stephen Nicholls, Roger Milne, Melissa Southey

Description:Targeted gene panel sequencing that measures genomic variation at different depths has potential diagnostic application. A targeted gene panel, smart nonuniformity sequencing, was developed to detect somatic variants associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), which requires an optimal sequencing depth of >500×; and germline variants requiring a lower ≥50× depth (panel 1). This was achieved by adjusting probe ratios for genomic regions relevant to identifying CHIP in comparison to those relevant to germline variation analysis. An additional custom panel containing only the genomic regions relevant to the identification of CHIP (panel 2) was also manufactured to confirm that panel 1 did not miss variants because of the complex design. Both panels were used to sequence 150 blood-derived DNAs; 94 DNAs from research participants aged 64 to 75 years; 16 DNAs with known germline variants; 16 DNAs with known germline variants (titrated from 0% to 100%); 24 DNAs from individuals aged <40 years; and 3 commercial CHIP controls and 3 high-molecular-weight DNA controls. The sequencing median depth ratio between the CHIP and germline relevant genomic regions was 4.7:1. Fourteen CHIP-associated variants were called in both panel 1 (1382× median variant depth) and panel 2 (1665× median variant depth). All known germline variants were identified (251× median variant depth). Smart nonuniformity sequencing reliably detects variants with allele frequency in the range >0.01 to 1 in one workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions About Graham G. Giles

What types of cancers does Graham G. Giles specialize in treating?

Graham G. Giles specializes in treating a wide range of cancers including breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, and more.

What treatment options does Graham G. Giles offer for cancer patients?

Graham G. Giles offers a comprehensive range of treatment options such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and personalized medicine.

How does Graham G. Giles approach personalized care for cancer patients?

Graham G. Giles takes a personalized approach by tailoring treatment plans to each patient's specific cancer type, stage, and individual needs.

What supportive care services does Graham G. Giles provide for cancer patients?

Graham G. Giles offers supportive care services such as pain management, palliative care, nutritional counseling, and access to clinical trials.

How does Graham G. Giles stay updated on the latest advancements in oncology?

Graham G. Giles regularly participates in medical conferences, research collaborations, and continuous education to stay informed about the latest advancements in oncology.

What can patients expect during their first consultation with Graham G. Giles?

During the first consultation, patients can expect a thorough evaluation of their medical history, discussion of diagnosis and treatment options, and a compassionate approach to addressing their concerns and questions.

More Oncologist Like Graham G. Giles in Melbourne

Toparrow