Profile picture of Dr. Graeme L. Jones

Rheumatologist

fillstar iconfillstar iconfillstar iconfillstar iconhalfstar icon

4.5

Australian Flag

Graeme L. Jones

Icon representing available degree

MBBS (Hons), MMedSc (Clinical Epidemiology), MD (Osteoporosis epidemiology), FRACP, FAFPHM

Icon that representing available experience

40 Years Overall Experience

Icon representing available city of this doctor

Hobart

Connect with Graeme L. Jones

Quick Appointment for Graeme L. Jones

No OPD information available

Services Offered by Graeme L. Jones

  • Arthritis

  • Osteoarthritis

  • Knee Replacement

  • Obesity

  • Osteoporosis

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

  • Synovitis

  • Acute Pain

  • Chronic Pain

  • Gout

  • Malnutrition

  • Metabolic Syndrome

  • Muscle Atrophy

  • Obesity in Children

  • Abdominal Obesity Metabolic Syndrome

  • Alzheimer's Disease

  • Ankylosing Spondylitis

  • Asthma

  • Bronchiectasis

  • Dementia

  • Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

  • Endometrial Cancer

  • Familial Hypertriglyceridemia

  • Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)

  • Hip Replacement

  • Invertebral Disc Disease

  • Kidney Transplant

  • Low Blood Sugar

  • Menopause

  • Mesothelioma

  • Metabolic Acidosis

  • Movement Disorders

  • Neuralgia

  • Parkinson's Disease

  • Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

  • Properdin Deficiency

  • Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 12

  • Squamous Cell Skin Carcinoma

  • Stroke

  • Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

  • Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)

  • Vasculitis

  • Vitamin D Deficiency

About Of Graeme L. Jones

Graeme L. Jones is a medical professional who helps people with many health issues like arthritis, obesity, chronic pain, and diabetes. He also works with conditions like Alzheimer's disease, asthma, and stroke. Graeme L. Jones is skilled in treating various diseases and conditions that affect the bones, joints, muscles, and overall health of patients.

He talks to patients in a friendly and clear way, making sure they understand their health problems and treatment options. Patients trust him because he listens to their concerns and explains things well. Graeme L. Jones stays updated with the latest medical knowledge and research to provide the best care for his patients.

He works well with other medical professionals, sharing information and collaborating to give patients the best possible treatment. Graeme L. Jones has published important research on topics like the benefits of yoga for knee osteoarthritis, showing his commitment to finding new ways to help patients improve their health.

Thanks to Graeme L. Jones's work, many patients have seen positive changes in their health and quality of life. His dedication to staying informed and working closely with patients and colleagues has made a real difference in the lives of those he treats. Patients appreciate his expertise, communication skills, and the positive impact he has on their well-being.

In summary, Graeme L. Jones is a caring and knowledgeable medical professional who uses the latest research to help patients with a wide range of health issues. His commitment to improving patient outcomes and his collaborative approach with colleagues make him a trusted and respected figure in the medical field.

Education of Graeme L. Jones

  • MBBS (Hons); University of Sydney; 1985

  • MMedSc (Clinical Epidemiology)

  • MD (Osteoporosis epidemiology)

  • FRACP (Fellow, Royal Australasian College of Physicians)

  • FAFPHM (Fellow, Australasian Faculty of Public Health Medicine)

Memberships of Graeme L. Jones

  • Australian Rheumatology Association

  • Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians

  • Fellow of the Faculty of Public Health Medicine

Publications by Graeme L. Jones

Yoga or Strengthening Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal: JAMA network open

Year: April 08, 2025

There is limited evidence on the comparative effectiveness of different exercise modalities, such as yoga and strengthening exercises, for managing knee osteoarthritis (OA). To compare the effectiveness of yoga vs strengthening exercise for reducing knee pain over 12 weeks in patients with knee OA. This single-center, assessor-blinded (for nonpatient-reported outcomes), parallel-arm, active-controlled, superiority randomized clinical trial included adults aged 40 years or older with knee OA and knee pain levels of 40 or higher on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) in Southern Tasmania, Australia. Participants were recruited from April 2021 to June 2022, and follow-up was completed in December 2022. Data were analyzed from May 2023 to July 2024. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the yoga and strengthening exercise groups. Both groups attended 2 supervised and 1 home-based session per week for 12 weeks followed by 3 unsupervised home-based sessions per week for weeks 13 to 24. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in VAS score over 12 weeks assessed using a range of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain) with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 10 mm. Secondary outcomes included knee pain over 24 weeks; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) knee pain, function, and stiffness; patient global assessment; Osteoarthritis Research Society International-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials response; physical performance measures; leg muscle strength; health-related quality of life assessed via the Assessment of Quality of Life-8 Dimensions (AQol-8D) utility score; depression assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9; and neuropathic pain assessment over 12 and 24 weeks. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. In total, 117 participants were randomized to the yoga (n = 58) or strengthening exercise (n = 59) program. Baseline characteristics of the participants were similar, with a mean (SD) age of 62.5 (8.3) years, and 85 participants (72.6%) were female. The mean (SD) baseline VAS knee pain score of 53.8 (16.0) indicated moderate knee pain. Over 12 weeks, the between-group mean difference in VAS knee pain change was -1.1 mm (95% CI, -7.8 to 5.7 mm), which was not statistically significant but remained within the prespecified noninferiority margin. Of 27 secondary outcomes assessed over 12 and 24 weeks, 7 were statistically significant in favor of yoga. The yoga group showed modestly greater improvements than the strengthening exercise group (between-group differences) over 24 weeks for WOMAC pain (-44.5 mm [95% CI, -70.7 to -18.3 mm]), WOMAC function (-139 mm [95% CI, -228.3 to -49.7 mm]), WOMAC stiffness (-17.6 mm [95% CI, -30.9 to -4.3 mm]), patient global assessment (-7.6 mm [95% CI, -15.1 to -0.2 mm]), and 40-m fast-paced walk test (1.8 [95% CI, 0.4-3.2]). In addition, the yoga group had a modestly greater improvement than the strengthening exercise for depression at 12 weeks (between-group difference in PHQ-9 score, -1.1 [95% CI, -1.9 to -0.2]) and quality of life at 24 weeks (between-group difference in AQoL-8D score, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.07]). Adverse events were similar in both groups and mild. In this randomized clinical trial, yoga did not significantly reduce knee pain compared with strengthening exercises. However, yoga was found to be noninferior to strengthening exercises, suggesting that integrating yoga as an alternative or complementary exercise option in clinical practice may help in managing knee OA. ANZCTR.org Identifier: ACTRN12621000066886.

Enhanced Non-EEG Multimodal Seizure Detection: A Real-World Model for Identifying Generalised Seizures Across the Ictal State.

Journal: IEEE Journal Of Biomedical And Health Informatics

Year: March 03, 2025

Non-electroencephalogram seizure detection holds promise for the early identification of generalised onset seizures. However, existing methods often suffer from high false alarm rates and difficulty distinguishing normal movements from seizure manifestations. To address this, we obtained exclusive access to the Open Seizure Database and selected a representative dataset of 94 events (42 generalised tonic-clonic seizures, 19 focal seizures, and 33 labelled as Other), totaling approximately 5 hours and 29 minutes. Each event contains acceleration and heart rate data, which were expertly annotated by a clinician in 5 second timesteps, with each timestep assigned a class label of Normal, Pre-Ictal, or Ictal. We introduce AMBER (Attention-guided Multi-Branching pipeline with Enhanced Residual Fusion), a multimodal seizure detection model designed for Ictal-Phase Detection. AMBER constructs multiple branches to form independent feature extraction pipelines for each sensing modality. The outputs of each branch are passed to a Residual Fusion layer, where the extracted features are combined into a fused representation and propagated through two densely connected blocks. The results of these experiments highlight the effectiveness of Ictal Phase Detection, with the model recording an accuracy and f1-score of 0.9027 and 0.9035, respectively, on unseen test data. Further experiments recorded True Positive Rate of 0.8342, 0.9485, and 0.9118 for the Normal, Pre-Ictal, and Ictal phases, respectively, with an average False Positive Rate of 0.0502. This study presents a novel Ictal Phase Detection technique that enhances seizure phase classification while showing reduced false alarms, laying the groundwork for further advancements in non-electroencephalogram-based seizure detection research.

Pathogen-specific exposure is associated with multisite chronic pain: A prospective cohort study.

Journal: Brain, Behavior, And Immunity

Year: January 16, 2025

Evidence suggests that pathogens may influence pain perception and regulation; however, no study has explored the relationship between serological evidence of infection and multisite chronic musculoskeletal pain. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between serological evidence of infection and multisite chronic musculoskeletal pain. Participants (n = 6,814; mean [SD]age, 56.5[8.2] years; females [52.9 %]) in the UK Biobank were included. Multiplex serology panel measuring serum immunoglobulin G antibody levels against 20 infectious agents was performed at baseline. Chronic pain (≥3 months) in the knee, neck/shoulder, hip, back, or 'all over the body' was assessed at baseline and follow-up. Participants were grouped by number of chronic pain sites: no chronic pain, chronic pain in 1-2 sites, or ≥3 sites. Multinomial logistic regression and mixed-effect multinomial logistic regression models were used for the analyses. The seroprevalences of serologically detected infections across the 20 agents ranged from 0.2 % to 95.4 %. In multivariable analyses, serological evidence of infection with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type-1 (HTLV-1), and Chlamydia Trachomatis was cross-sectionally associated with chronic pain in ≥3 sites compared to those without chronic pain. In longitudinal analyses, EBV [relative risk ratio (RRR) = 2.18, 95 %CI:1.17 - 4.05] and Chlamydia Trachomatis [RRR = 1.38, 95 %CI:1.09 - 1.74] were also associated with chronic pain in ≥3 sites. Additionally, serological evidence of single and multiple infections was associated with chronic pain in ≥3 sites, but not in 1-2 sites. Collectively, serological evidence of infection with EBV and Chlamydia Trachomatis is associated with multisite chronic musculoskeletal pain. These findings suggest that infectious agents may play a role in the pathogenesis of widespread chronic pain.

Rheumatoid arthritis and subsequent fracture risk: an individual person meta-analysis to update FRAX.

Journal: Osteoporosis International : A Journal Established As Result Of Cooperation Between The European Foundation For Osteoporosis And The National Osteoporosis Foundation Of The USA

Year: October 24, 2024

The relationship between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and fracture risk was estimated in an international meta-analysis of individual-level data from 29 prospective cohorts. RA was associated with an increased fracture risk in men and women, and these data will be used to update FRAX®. Background: RA is a well-documented risk factor for subsequent fracture that is incorporated into the FRAX algorithm. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in an international meta-analysis, the association between rheumatoid arthritis and subsequent fracture risk and its relation to sex, age, duration of follow-up, and bone mineral density (BMD) with a view to updating FRAX. Methods: The resource comprised 1,909,896 men and women, aged 20-116 years, from 29 prospective cohorts in which the prevalence of RA was 3% or less (primary analysis) and an additional 17 cohorts with a prevalence greater than 3% (supplementary analysis). The association between RA and fracture risk (any clinical fracture, osteoporotic fracture, major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and hip fracture) was examined using an extension of the Poisson regression model in each cohort and each sex, followed by random-effects meta-analyses of the weighted beta coefficients. Results: In the primary analysis, RA was reported in 1.3% of individuals. During 15,683,133 person-years of follow-up, 139,002 fractures occurred, of which 27,518 were hip fractures. RA was associated with an increased risk of any clinical fracture (hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.65). The HRs were of similar magnitude for osteoporotic fracture and MOF but higher for hip fracture (HR = 2.23; 95% CI 1.85-2.69). For hip fracture, there was a significant interaction with age with higher HRs at younger ages. HRs did not differ between men and women and were independent of exposure to glucocorticoids and femoral neck BMD. Lower HRs were observed in the supplementary analysis cohorts, particularly in those with a high apparent prevalence of RA, possibly from conflation of RA with osteoarthritis. Conclusions: A diagnosis of RA confers an increased risk of fracture that is largely independent of BMD, sex, and corticosteroids. RA should be retained as a risk factor in future iterations of FRAX with updated risk functions to improve fracture risk prediction.

Acetabular dysplasia and the risk of developing hip osteoarthritis within 4-8 years: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 18,807 hips from the World COACH consortium.

Journal: Osteoarthritis And Cartilage

Year: July 31, 2024

Objective: To study the association between various radiographic definitions of acetabular dysplasia (AD) and incident radiographic hip osteoarthritis (RHOA), and to analyze in subgroups. Methods: Hips free of RHOA at baseline and with follow-up within 4-8 years were drawn from the World COACH consortium. The Wiberg center edge angle (WCEA), acetabular depth width ratio (ADR), and the modified acetabular index (mAI) were calculated. AD was defined as WCEA≤25°, and for secondary analyses as WCEA≤20°, ADR ≤250, mAI ≥ 13°, and a combination. A logistic regression model with generalized mixed effects with 3 levels adjusted for age, biological sex, and body mass index (BMI) was used. Descriptive statistics stratified by age, biological sex and BMI were reported. Results: A total of 18,807 hips from 9 studies were included. Baseline characteristics: age 61.84 (± 8.32) years, BMI 27.40 (± 4.49) kg/m², 70.1% women. 4766 hips (25.3%) had WCEA≤25°. Within 4-8 years (mean 5.8 ±1.6) follow-up, 378 hips (2.0%) developed incident RHOA. We found an association between AD and RHOA (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.80 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-2.34). In secondary analyses, all other definitions of AD were also associated with incident RHOA (aOR ranging from 1.52 95% CI 1.19-1.94 to 1.96 95% CI 1.26-3.02). Descriptive statistics showed that the relative risk (RR) in AD hips to develop RHOA was higher compared to non-AD hips in age group 61-70 (RR 1.70), BMI<25 (RR 1.66), and in female hips (RR 1.73). Conclusions: AD was consistently associated with incident RHOA. Explorative analyses show that AD hips in women and age group 61-70 years seem to be more at risk of developing RHOA compared to non-AD hips.

Patient Reviews for Graeme L. Jones

Isla Bishop

Graeme L. Jones is a fantastic Rheumatologist. He listened to all my concerns and provided thorough explanations. Highly recommend!

Oscar Abbott

Dr. Jones is a top-notch Rheumatologist in Hobart. He is caring and knowledgeable, making me feel at ease during my appointments.

Matilda Davies

I am so grateful for the care I received from Graeme L. Jones. He is a skilled Rheumatologist who truly goes above and beyond for his patients.

Hugo Fisher

Graeme L. Jones is an exceptional Rheumatologist. He took the time to explain my condition in a way that was easy for me to understand. Highly recommended!

Elsie Walsh

Dr. Jones is a compassionate and dedicated Rheumatologist. He helped me manage my symptoms effectively and I am very satisfied with the care I received.

Archie Campbell

I had a great experience with Graeme L. Jones as my Rheumatologist. He is professional, kind, and truly cares about his patients' well-being.

Poppy Bennett

Dr. Jones is an excellent Rheumatologist who provided me with personalized and effective treatment. I am very happy with the results.

Felix Harrison

I highly recommend Graeme L. Jones for anyone seeking a Rheumatologist in Hobart. He is thorough, attentive, and truly cares about his patients' health.

Millie Palmer

Dr. Jones is a wonderful Rheumatologist who helped me manage my condition with great expertise. I am very thankful for his care and support.

Frequently Asked Questions About Graeme L. Jones

What conditions does Graeme L. Jones specialize in as a rheumatologist?

Graeme L. Jones specializes in the diagnosis and treatment of various rheumatic conditions such as arthritis, lupus, gout, and osteoporosis.

What services does Graeme L. Jones offer to patients?

Graeme L. Jones offers comprehensive services including joint pain evaluation, medication management, injections, and personalized treatment plans tailored to each patient's needs.

How can I schedule an appointment with Graeme L. Jones?

Patients can schedule an appointment with Graeme L. Jones by contacting the clinic directly via phone or through the online appointment booking system on the clinic's website.

What should I expect during my first visit to Graeme L. Jones's clinic?

During your first visit, Graeme L. Jones will conduct a thorough evaluation of your medical history, perform a physical examination, and may order additional tests to accurately diagnose your condition.

Can Graeme L. Jones help manage chronic pain associated with rheumatic conditions?

Yes, Graeme L. Jones can help manage chronic pain associated with rheumatic conditions through a combination of medication, physical therapy, lifestyle modifications, and other interventions tailored to each patient.

What are some common signs that indicate I should see a rheumatologist like Graeme L. Jones?

Common signs that may indicate the need to see a rheumatologist include persistent joint pain, swelling, stiffness, fatigue, and difficulty performing daily activities. If you are experiencing these symptoms, it is advisable to consult with Graeme L. Jones for further evaluation and management.

More Rheumatologist Like Graeme L. Jones in Hobart

Toparrow