Profile picture of Dr. Peter A. Dargaville

Neonatologist

Australian Flag

Peter A. Dargaville

Icon representing available degree

MB BS, MD, FRACP

Icon that representing available experience

40 Years Overall Experience

Icon representing available city of this doctor

Hobart

Connect with Peter A. Dargaville

Quick Appointment for Peter A. Dargaville

No OPD information available

Services Offered by Peter A. Dargaville

  • Infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome

  • Premature Infant

  • Infantile Apnea

  • Infantile Pneumothorax

  • Meconium Aspiration Syndrome

  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

  • Cerebral Hypoxia

  • Micrognathia

  • Respiratory Acidosis

  • Central Sleep Apnea

  • Pierre Robin Sequence

  • Stridor

About Of Peter A. Dargaville

Peter A. Dargaville is a male medical professional who helps babies with breathing problems like Infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Premature Infant issues, and other conditions that affect their lungs and breathing. He also treats babies with problems like Infantile Apnea, Infantile Pneumothorax, and Meconium Aspiration Syndrome.

Peter Dargaville uses special skills and treatments to help babies breathe better and stay healthy. He is good at communicating with patients and makes them feel comfortable and safe. Patients trust him because he is kind and explains things in a way they can understand.

Peter Dargaville stays updated with the latest medical knowledge and research to provide the best care for his patients. He works well with other medical professionals and values teamwork to help patients get better.

Peter Dargaville's work has positively impacted many babies' lives by helping them breathe better and improving their overall health. His research on lung expression following mechanical ventilation has been published in a reputable medical journal, showing his dedication to advancing medical knowledge.

In summary, Peter A. Dargaville is a caring and skilled medical professional who specializes in helping babies with breathing problems. He stays updated with the latest medical research, works well with colleagues, and has made a positive impact on many patients' lives.

Education of Peter A. Dargaville

  • MB BS (Tas) — University of Tasmania — 1985

  • MD (Doctor of Medicine, research) — University of Melbourne — 2000

  • FRACP — Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians — 1996

Memberships of Peter A. Dargaville

  • Fellow, Royal Australasian College of Physicians (FRACP)

  • Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania

  • Royal Hobart Hospital

  • Murdoch Children’s Research Institute

Publications by Peter A. Dargaville

Increasing heterogeneity is associated with IL-6 expression in the lung following mechanical ventilation.

Journal: American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology
Year: April 16, 2025
Authors: Ella Smalley, David Trevascus, Yong Song, Melissa Preissner, Peter Dargaville, Martin Donnelley, Kaye Morgan, Stephen Dubsky, Graeme Zosky

Description:This study aimed to characterize how peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) influence regional lung volume heterogeneity as a result of mechanical ventilation and the influence of this heterogeneity on markers of inflammation within the lungs. Four groups of BALB/C mice (n = 7 or 8 per group) were mechanically ventilated for 2 h using low or high (12 cmH2O or 20 cmH2O) peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) with or without 2 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Four-dimensional computed tomography (4-DCT) images were acquired using synchrotron-based radiation source at baseline and after 2 h. Regional tidal volumes were obtained by 4-D cross-correlational X-ray velocimetry, whereas end-expiratory volume was quantified by Hounsfield units. Tissue was harvested from 10 lung regions, and expression of IL-6 and monocyte chemo-attractant protein 1 (MCP-1) was quantified using qPCR. We found a significant reduction in specific end-expiratory volume (sEEV) in mice ventilated with low PIP and no PEEP and a reduction in tidal volume in groups without PEEP. End-expiratory volume heterogeneity decreased in the low PIP and no PEEP group, whereas tidal volume heterogeneity decreased in the equivalent high PIP group, potentially due to regional redistribution of lung volumes. We found associations between IL-6 expression and tidal volume heterogeneity. In this study, we have demonstrated that changes in PIP and PEEP impact atelectasis, overdistension, and heterogeneity, and that increases in tidal volume heterogeneity may be driving IL-6-mediated biotrauma. These findings highlight the importance of considering the spatial distribution of tidal volumes as a driver of lung injury during mechanical ventilation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The combination of low inspiratory and expiratory pressure promotes atelectasis but is not associated with markers of injury in the healthy lung during short-term ventilation. High inspiratory pressures promote tidal volume heterogeneity, which is correlated with the expression of genetic markers of lung injury. These data suggest that heterogeneity in tidal volume may be a key driver of biotrauma in the healthy, mechanically ventilated lung.

Non-invasive respiratory support paired with minimally invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants.

Journal: Seminars In Perinatology
Year: May 14, 2025
Authors: Peter Dargaville, Emily Cripps

Description:Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) commenced soon after birth is highly effective in providing mechanical respiratory support for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). However, NIV alone frequently fails to provide adequate respiratory support for infants with more significant respiratory compromise due to RDS. Without an endotracheal tube as the conduit to administer exogenous surfactant in such cases, less invasive approaches to surfactant delivery have emerged, with those involving the use of a thin catheter (termed minimally invasive surfactant therapy, MIST) now in the ascendancy. The application of MIST with NIV support continuing allows spontaneous breathing to be harnessed for optimal surfactant dispersal to the distal airspaces. Here we examine the importance of this pairing of NIV with MIST and review the evidence for optimization of NIV before, during and after delivery of surfactant. All evidence points to NIV and MIST being an elegant and synergistic pairing of two therapies for optimal respiratory support of preterm infants in early life. Whilst much of the clinical trial data regarding the pairing of NIV and MIST relates to application of standard continuous positive airway pressure, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in its various forms may offer additional advantage, and further studies are warranted.

Corrigendum to "The Paediatric AirWay Suction (PAWS) appropriateness guide for endotracheal suction interventions" [Aust Crit Care 35 (2022) 651-660].

Journal: Australian Critical Care : Official Journal Of The Confederation Of Australian Critical Care Nurses
Year: April 05, 2025
Authors: Jessica Schults, Karina Charles, Debbie Long, Georgia Brown, Beverley Copnell, Peter Dargaville, Kylie Davies, Simon Erikson, Kate Forrest, Jane Harnischfeger, Adam Irwin, Tina Kendrick, Anna Lake, George Ntoumenopoulos, Michaela Waak, Mark Woodard, Lyvonne Tume, Marie Cooke, Marion Mitchell, Lisa Hall, Amanda Ullman

Antimicrobials for Neonates: Practitioner Decisions and Diagnostic Certainty.

Journal: The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Year: February 25, 2025
Authors: Naomi Spotswood, Erin Grace, Peter Dargaville, James Beeson, Leah Hickey, Gabrielle Haeusler, Penelope Bryant, Celia Cooper, Amy Keir

Description:Background: Antimicrobials are frequently prescribed to neonates who require hospital care, but the influences on clinical decision-making and practice variation in this process are ill-understood. We performed a cross-sectional survey of practitioners who prescribe antimicrobials in 3 Australian neonatal units. Methods: During two 5-day data capture periods per center, 56 practitioners reported their general confidence in antimicrobial decision-making for neonates. Then, 4 questionnaires evaluated diagnostic certainty and influences on antimicrobial decision-making for 68 antimicrobial courses and 11 infection evaluations where antimicrobials were not prescribed. Results: Self-reported guideline use at antimicrobial commencement was high (26/31, 84%). Clinical risk factors, clinical signs and laboratory tests contributed variably to decisions to start and cease antimicrobials. Consultation with a colleague contributed to 14/31 (45%) decisions to commence antimicrobials and 13/34 (38%) decisions to cease them. The most frequent responses to questions regarding the likelihood of infection and the possibility of an alternative diagnosis were "some possibility" and "some likelihood." Team concordance in responses ranged from 14% to 50%. While practitioners in roles that denoted more clinical experience had greater general confidence in antimicrobial decision-making, this difference was not observed in real-world clinical situations where infection was not microbiologically confirmed. Conclusions: Clinical, laboratory, practitioner, team and center-based factors each influence antimicrobial prescribing decisions. Clinical uncertainty and differing guidelines likely contribute to practice variation. Future work to inform stewardship efforts should include improved guideline consistency, roles of diagnostic aids and a better understanding of the medicocultural contributors to neonatal antimicrobial prescribing.

Intratracheal Budesonide Mixed With Surfactant for Extremely Preterm Infants: The PLUSS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal: Jama
Year: November 11, 2024
Authors: Brett Manley, C Omar Kamlin, Susan Donath, Kate Francis, Jeanie L Cheong, Peter Dargaville, Jennifer Dawson, Susan Jacobs, Pita Birch, Steven Resnick, Georg Schmölzer, Brenda Law, Risha Bhatia, Katinka Bach, Koert De Waal, Javeed Travadi, Pieter Koorts, Mary Berry, Kei Lui, Victor Rajadurai, Suresh Chandran, Martin Kluckow, Elza Cloete, Margaret Broom, Michael Stark, Adrienne Gordon, Vinayak Kodur, Lex Doyle, Peter Davis, Christopher J Mckinlay

Description:Importance: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a common adverse outcome in extremely preterm infants born at less than 28 weeks' gestation. Systemic corticosteroids are effective against BPD but may be associated with adverse outcomes. Corticosteroids given directly into the lungs may be effective and safer. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of early intratracheal corticosteroid administration on survival free of BPD in extremely preterm infants. Design, setting, and participants: Double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted in 21 neonatal units in 4 countries (Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and Singapore), enrolling infants born at less than 28 weeks' gestation and less than 48 hours old who were mechanically ventilated (regardless of ventilator settings or oxygen requirements) or who were receiving noninvasive respiratory support and had a clinical decision to treat with surfactant. Recruitment occurred from January 2018 to March 2023. The last participant was discharged from the hospital in August 2023. Interventions: Infants were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive budesonide, 0.25 mg/kg, mixed with surfactant (poractant alfa), administered via an endotracheal tube or thin catheter, or surfactant only. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was survival free of BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. There were 15 secondary outcomes, including the 2 components of the primary outcome (survival at 36 weeks and BPD among survivors), and 9 predefined safety outcomes (adverse events). Results: The primary analysis included 1059 infants, 524 in the budesonide and surfactant group and 535 in the surfactant-only group. Overall, infants had a mean gestational age of 25.6 weeks (SD, 1.3 weeks) and a mean birth weight of 775 g (SD, 197 g); 586 (55.3%) were male. Survival free of BPD occurred in 134 infants (25.6%) in the budesonide and surfactant group and 121 infants (22.6%) in the surfactant-only group (adjusted risk difference, 2.7% [95% CI, -2.1% to 7.4%]). At 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, 83.2% of infants were alive in the budesonide and surfactant group and 80.6% in the surfactant-only group. Of these, 69.3% and 71.9% were diagnosed with BPD, respectively. Conclusions and relevance: In extremely preterm infants receiving surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome, early intratracheal budesonide may have little to no effect on survival free of BPD. Trial registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12617000322336.

Frequently Asked Questions About Peter A. Dargaville

What conditions does Peter A. Dargaville treat as a Neonatologist?

Peter A. Dargaville specializes in treating various conditions in newborns, including respiratory distress syndrome, prematurity-related complications, and congenital anomalies.

What services does Peter A. Dargaville provide for premature infants?

Peter A. Dargaville offers specialized care for premature infants, including respiratory support, nutritional management, developmental assessments, and follow-up care.

How does Peter A. Dargaville support families with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)?

Peter A. Dargaville provides comprehensive support to families with infants in the NICU, offering education, emotional support, and guidance on navigating the challenges of having a newborn in critical care.

What are some common concerns parents have about their newborn's health that Peter A. Dargaville can address?

Peter A. Dargaville can address concerns related to feeding difficulties, jaundice, breathing problems, infections, and developmental delays in newborns.

Does Peter A. Dargaville offer consultations for expectant parents with high-risk pregnancies?

Yes, Peter A. Dargaville provides consultations for expectant parents with high-risk pregnancies to discuss potential neonatal complications, treatment options, and postnatal care plans.

How does Peter A. Dargaville collaborate with other healthcare professionals to ensure the best outcomes for newborns?

Peter A. Dargaville works closely with obstetricians, pediatricians, nurses, and other specialists to coordinate care, develop treatment plans, and provide multidisciplinary support for newborns in need of specialized care.

More Neonatologist Like Peter A. Dargaville in Hobart

Toparrow