Judith Trotman

We are now a quarter of a century after the transformative impact of rituximab in improving overall survival for patients with follicular lymphoma. With a burgeoning array of effective immunochemotherapy approaches, we can now frame many patients' expectations of longevity and a "functional cure," with survival estimates for many newly diagnosed patients comparable to age- and gender-matched populations. We highlight not just heterogeneity in disease but also in patients, which influences therapeutic decision-making in an immunochemotherapy era where progression-free survival advances are associated with efficacy-toxicity trade-offs, and no clear overall survival advantage is associated with any specific regimen. We provide the metrics that assist, prognostication both at diagnosis and after initial therapy, but we also highlight the limited long-term follow-up in institutional, population, and clinical trial data sets to inform our survival estimates. Nonetheless, the data are sufficient to empower us to reframe more optimistic conversations with our patients and the lymphoma community, discussions that engender hope and planning for a life lived long, and well, after therapy for follicular lymphoma.

We report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from the ROSEWOOD trial (NCT03332017), which demonstrated superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile with zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab (ZO) versus obinutuzumab (O) in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL). PROs were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires at baseline and subsequently every 12 weeks. All QLQ-C30 domains and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) scores were analyzed descriptively. At the key clinical timepoints (weeks 12 and 24), a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was used to evaluate the key PRO endpoints, including global health status, physical and role functioning, and symptoms of fatigue, pain, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting. Clinically meaningful change was defined as a ≥ 5-point mean difference from baseline and between the ZO and O arms. Patients were randomized to ZO (n = 145) or O (n = 72). By week 48, descriptive analysis results indicated that patients in the ZO arm demonstrated improved outcomes in role functioning and fatigue and nausea/vomiting symptoms, compared with those in the O arm. Both groups experienced improvements in pain symptoms. EQ-5D-5L VAS scores showed no observable differences between treatment arms through week 48. MMRM analysis revealed that the global health status/quality of life of patients treated with ZO improved, as did fatigue, at week 12. At week 24, patients in the ZO arm experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in role functioning, pain, and fatigue. In patients with R/R FL, ZO was associated with improved PROs compared with O. These findings suggest that zanubrutinib contributed clinically meaningful benefits to patient HRQoL when added to obinutuzumab. The ROSEWOOD trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (BGB-3111-212; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03332017).

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a significant cause of morbidity associated with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The phase 3 ASPEN study compared the efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib with ibrutinib in patients with WM. This ad hoc analysis examined treatment outcomes with zanubrutinib or ibrutinib on PN symptoms associated with WM in patients enrolled in ASPEN. Logistic regression was performed between PN symptom resolution and several predictors. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed using the validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. Forty-nine patients with PN symptoms were included (zanubrutinib treated, n=27; ibrutinib treated, n=22). Overall, 35 patients (71.4%) experienced resolution of PN symptoms, with a median time to resolution of 10.1 months (range, 1-46.8). In cohort 1 (MYD88 mutation), the median time to PN symptom resolution was 4.6 months (range, 1.1-46.8) with zanubrutinib and 14.1 months (range, 1-44) with ibrutinib. Logistic regression demonstrated a significant relationship between PN symptom resolution and both major response (hazard ratio [HR], 10.67 [95% CI,2.20-51.81]; P=.0033) and lower baseline anti-MAG antibody levels (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.52-1.00]; P=.0486). Patients with PN symptom resolution had greater improvement in HRQOL. Physical functioning improved in patients with PN symptom resolution and was unchanged in patients without resolution. Improvements observed in PN symptoms may be in response to a reduction in IgM. While further investigation is required, this analysis supports the potential use and further exploration of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors to treat PN symptoms in patients with WM. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03053440.

Aim ASPEN is a randomized, open-label, Phase III study comparing zanubrutinib and ibrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM).Materials & Methods: Patient-reported outcomes were exploratory end points assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L VAS scores. Results: Overall, 201 patients (102 zanubrutinib; 99 ibrutinib) were enrolled. Clinically meaningful differences were observed in diarrhea and nausea/vomiting in both the intent-to-treat population and in patients attaining very good partial response (VGPR) in earlier cycles of treatment, as well as in long-term physical functioning and fatigue in patients achieving VGPR. Conclusion: Treatment with zanubrutinib was associated with greater improvements in health-related quality of life compared with ibrutinib in patients with WM and MYD88 mutations.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03053440 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

In classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), responsiveness to immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) is associated with specific tumor microenvironment (TME) and peripheral blood features. The role of ICB in nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is not established. To gain insights into its potential in NLPHL, we compared TME and peripheral blood signatures between HLs using an integrative multiomic analysis. A discovery/validation approach in 121 NLPHL and 114 cHL patients highlighted >2-fold enrichment in programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and T-cell Ig and ITIM domain (TIGIT) gene expression for NLPHL versus cHL. Multiplex imaging showed marked increase in intra-tumoral protein expression of PD-1+ (and/or TIGIT+) CD4+ T-cells and PD-1+CD8+ T-cells in NLPHL compared to cHL. This included T-cells that rosetted with lymphocyte predominant (LP) and Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells. In NLPHL, intra-tumoral PD-1+CD4+ T-cells frequently expressed TCF-1, a marker of heightened T-cell response to ICB. The peripheral blood signatures between HLs were also distinct, with higher levels of PD-1+TIGIT+ in TH1, TH2, and regulatory CD4+ T-cells in NLPHL versus cHL. Circulating PD-1+CD4+ had high levels of TCF-1. Notably, in both lymphomas, highly expanded populations of clonal TIGIT+PD-1+CD4+ and TIGIT+PD-1+CD8+ T-cells in the blood were also present in the TME, indicating that immune-checkpoint expressing T-cells circulated between intra-tumoral and blood compartments. In in vitro assays, ICB was capable of reducing rosette formation around LP and HRS cells, suggesting that disruption of rosetting may be a mechanism of action of ICB in HL. Overall, results indicate that further evaluation of ICB is warranted in NLPHL.

An International, Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized Study of BGB-3111 Combined With Obinutuzumab Compared With Obinutuzumab Monotherapy in Relapsed/ Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

A Phase 2, Open-label Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma