Multiple at-risk groups have lower lung function during the grass pollen season.
Description:The prevalence of pollen-induced health problems is expected to increase as climate change worsens.1 Previous research has found that adults had worse pollen-induced airway impairment compared to children.2 We hypothesized that different lifestyle and environmental factors and/or lung aging may explain why the different health impacts of pollen across age groups. To the best of our knowledge, no adult population-based study has assessed the relationships between ambient pollen exposure and post-bronchodilator (BD) lung function as a measure of fixed airflow obstruction, or gas transfer as a measure of parenchymal damage. Studies that investigated pre-BD lung function in adults have reported no significant changes in and out of the pollen season, but the sample sizes were small and only stratified by asthma and/or seasonal allergic rhinitis.2 However, there are more individual, lifestyle and environmental factors to consider that may interact with each other and pollen on lung function. Using data collected from the 6th decade follow-up (mean age: 53 years; n = 2471) of the population-based Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study (TAHS) conducted between 2012 and 2016, we assessed cross-sectional relationships between the temperate grass pollen season and lung function using regression. Temperate grass pollen season was used as a proxy because daily pollen counts were available for a subset of participants only. We defined ‘in season’ as from October to December, as pollen levels were insignificant outside this period.1 Lung function measurements (pre- and post-BD spirometry & gas transfer) were converted to z-scores using Global Lung Initiative reference values. All models included adjustments for temperature and humidity as a priori confounders. We also examined potential interactions with current allergic disease (hay fever, asthma, pollen allergy, eczema), current chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), grass pollen sensitisation [skin prick test (SPT)≥3 mm], inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use, traffic-related air pollution (TRAP), smoking, urbanisation, and residential greenness using likelihood ratio tests. For more detailed definitions and results including summary statistics of environmental factors (where available), please refer to the Supplementary Materials. We found that lung function testing, comparing in to out of the grass pollen season, was associated with a lower pre- and post-BD FEV1/FVC (forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity ratio) and FEF25–75 % (mid-forced expiratory flow) as an index of smaller airway calibre, only in certain subgroups, namely: smokers with asthma/hay fever, people with asthma/hay fever who did not use ICS in the past 12 months, and in those with co-existing allergic diseases or living 200 m from major roads (Fig. 1). People with asthma who also smoked or did not recently use ICS additionally had lower pre-/post-BD FEV1 (Table 1). No evidence of interaction was found with CRS, residential greenness, NO2 or PM2.5.









