Profile picture of Dr. Pamela A. Mccombe

Neurologist

Australian Flag

Pamela A. Mccombe

Icon representing available degree

BSc, MBBS, PhD, FRACP

Icon that representing available experience

49 Years Overall Experience

Icon representing available city of this doctor

Brisbane

Connect with Pamela A. Mccombe

Quick Appointment for Pamela A. Mccombe

No OPD information available

Services Offered by Pamela A. Mccombe

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig's Disease)

  • Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

  • Primary Lateral Sclerosis

  • Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS)

  • CACH Syndrome

  • Guillain-Barre Syndrome

  • Neuromyelitis Optica

  • Optic Neuritis

  • Transverse Myelitis

  • Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

  • Chronic Polyradiculoneuritis

  • Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis

  • Congenital Fiber-Type Disproportion

  • Cramp-Fasciculation Syndrome

  • Dementia

  • Developmental Dysphasia Familial

  • Drug Induced Dyskinesia

  • Dysarthria

  • Encephalitis

  • Epilepsy

  • Frontonasal Dysplasia Klippel Feil Syndrome

  • Frontotemporal Dementia

  • Gangliosidosis

  • Gastrostomy

  • Hereditary Spastic Paraparesis

  • Klippel-Feil Syndrome

  • Leukocytosis

  • Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy

  • Menopause

  • Myasthenia Gravis

  • Myofibrillar Myopathy

  • Opsoclonus-Myoclonus Syndrome

  • Rhabdomyolysis

  • Stroke

  • Tay-Sachs Disease

  • Thymic Epithelial Tumor

  • Tubular Aggregate Myopathy

  • X-Linked Myotubular Myopathy

About Of Pamela A. Mccombe

Pamela A. McCombe is a female medical professional who specializes in treating various neurological conditions. Some of the conditions she helps patients with include Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Epilepsy, Stroke, and many others.

She provides care for patients with different neurological disorders, using her expertise and skills to diagnose and treat their conditions. Pamela A. McCombe communicates with her patients in a caring and understanding manner, which helps build trust and confidence in her abilities.

To stay updated with the latest medical knowledge and research, Pamela A. McCombe regularly attends conferences, reads medical journals, and collaborates with other healthcare professionals. This dedication to learning ensures that she can offer the most effective treatments to her patients.

Pamela A. McCombe works closely with her colleagues and values teamwork in providing the best care for patients. By sharing knowledge and expertise with other medical professionals, she contributes to a collaborative and supportive healthcare environment.

Through her work, Pamela A. McCombe has positively impacted many patients' lives by improving their health and quality of life. Her dedication to patient care and commitment to staying informed about advancements in her field have led to successful outcomes for those under her care.

One of Pamela A. McCombe's notable publications is "Standardized Definition of Progression Independent of Relapse Activity (PIRA) in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis," published in JAMA Neurology in April 2025. This publication highlights her contribution to advancing the understanding and treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.

In summary, Pamela A. McCombe is a compassionate and knowledgeable medical professional who specializes in treating neurological disorders. Through her expertise, communication skills, commitment to learning, and collaborative approach, she has made a significant positive impact on her patients' lives.

Education of Pamela A. Mccombe

  • BSc - Bachelor of Science; University of Queensland, Australia;

  • MBBS - Bachelor of Medicine & Bachelor of Surgery, Medical Science; University of Queensland, Australia; 1976

  • Neurology training; Prince Henry / Prince of Wales Hospitals, Sydney

  • PhD - Doctor of Philosophy; University of Sydney; 1984

Memberships of Pamela A. Mccombe

  • Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (FRACP)

  • Australian and New Zealand Association of Neurologists (ANZAN)

  • Royal Australasian College of Physicians

  • Brain Foundation Australia

Publications by Pamela A. Mccombe

Standardized Definition of Progression Independent of Relapse Activity (PIRA) in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Journal: JAMA neurology
Year: April 14, 2025
Authors: Jannis Müller, Sifat Sharmin, Johannes Lorscheider, Serkan Ozakbas, Rana Karabudak, Dana Horakova, Bianca Weinstock Guttman, Vahid Shaygannejad, Masoud Etemadifar, Raed Alroughani, Francesco Patti, Sara Eichau, Alexandre Prat, Alessandra Lugaresi, Valentina Tomassini, Allan Kermode, Maria Amato, Recai Turkoglu, Ayse Altintas, Katherine Buzzard, Aysun Soysal, Anneke Van Der Walt, Helmut Butzkueven, Yolanda Blanco, Oliver Gerlach, Samia Khoury, Michael Barnett, Nevin John, Jeannette Lechner Scott, Matteo Foschi, Andrea Surcinelli, Vincent Van Pesch, Julie Prevost, Maria Sa, Davide Maimone, Marie D'hooghe, Stella Hughes, Suzanne Hodgkinson, Chris Mcguigan, Elisabetta Cartechini, Bruce Taylor, Daniele Spitaleri, Mark Slee, Pamela Mccombe, Bassem Yamout, Pascal Benkert, Jens Kuhle, Ludwig Kappos, Izanne Roos, Tomas Kalincik, Marc Girard, Pierre Duquette, Marzena Fabis Pedrini, William Carroll, Olga Skibina, Riadh Gouider, Saloua Mrabet, Cristina Ramo Tello, Claudio Solaro, Mario Habek, Bart Van Wijmeersch, Radek Ampapa, Richard Macdonell, Celia Oreja Guevara, Koen De Gans, Guy Laureys, Jiwon Oh, Justin Garber, Orla Gray, Eduardo Agüera Morales, Jose Sanchez Menoyo, Tamara Castillo Triviño, Nikolaos Grigoriadis, Thor Petersen, Todd Hardy, Steve Vucic, Stephen Reddel, Sudarshini Ramanathan, Abdullah Al Asmi, Mihaela Simu, Seyed Baghbanian, Dieter Poehlau, Talal Al Harbi, Juan Rojas, Norma Deri, Patrice Lalive, Melissa Cambron, Tunde Csepany, Neil Shuey, Barbara Willekens, Cameron Shaw, Danny Decoo, Jennifer Massey, Özgür Yaldizli, Tobias Derfuss, Cristina Granziera

Description:Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is a significant contributor to long-term disability accumulation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Prior studies have used varying PIRA definitions, hampering the comparability of study results. To compare various definitions of PIRA. This cohort study involved a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the MSBase registry from July 2004 to July 2023. The participants were patients with MS from 186 centers across 43 countries who had clinically definite relapsing-remitting MS, a complete minimal dataset, and 3 or more documented Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessments. Three-hundred sixty definitions of PIRA as combinations of the following criteria: baseline disability (fixed baseline with re-baselining after PIRA, or plus re-baselining after relapses, or plus re-baselining after improvements), minimum confirmation period (6, 12, or 24 months), confirmation magnitude (EDSS score at/above worsening score or at/above threshold compared with baseline), freedom from relapse at EDSS score worsening (90 days prior, 90 days prior and 30 days after, 180 days prior and after, since previous EDSS assessment, or since baseline), and freedom from relapse at confirmation (30 days prior, 90 days prior, 30 days before and after, or between worsening and confirmation). For each definition, we quantified PIRA incidence and persistence (ie, absence of a 3-month confirmed EDSS improvement over ≥5 years). Among 87 239 patients with MS, 33 303 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 24 152 (72.5%) were female and 9151 (27.5%) were male. At the first visits, the mean (SD) age was 36.4 (10.9) years; 28 052 patients (84.2%) had relapsing-remitting MS, and the median (IQR) EDSS score was 2.0 (1.0-3.0). Participants had a mean (SD) 15.1 (11.9) visits over 8.9 (5.2) years. PIRA incidence ranged from 0.141 to 0.658 events per decade and persistence from 0.753 to 0.919, depending on the definition. In particular, the baseline and confirmation period influenced PIRA detection. The following definition yielded balanced incidence and persistence: a significant disability worsening compared with a baseline (reset after each PIRA event, relapse, and EDSS score improvement), in absence of relapses since the last EDSS assessment, confirmed with EDSS scores (not preceded by relapses within 30 days) that remained above the worsening threshold for at least 12 months. Incidence and persistence of PIRA are determined by the definition used. The proposed standardized definition aims to enhance comparability among studies.

Segmentation of the human tongue musculature using MRI: Field guide and validation in motor neuron disease.

Journal: Computers In Biology And Medicine
Year: March 05, 2025
Authors: Thomas Shaw, Fernanda Ribeiro, Xiangyun Zhu, Patrick Aiken, Saskia Bollmann, Steffen Bollmann, Jeryn Chang, Kali Chidley, Harriet Dempsey Jones, Zeinab Eftekhari, Jennifer Gillespie, Robert Henderson, Matthew Kiernan, Ira Ktena, Pamela Mccombe, Shyuan Ngo, Shana Taubert, Brooke-mai Whelan, Xincheng Ye, Frederik Steyn, Sicong Tu, Markus Barth

Description:This work addresses the challenge of reliably measuring the muscles of the human tongue, which are difficult to quantify due to complex interwoven muscle types. We introduce a new semi-automated method, enabled by a manually curated dataset of MRI scans to accurately measure five key tongue muscles, combining AI-assisted, atlas-based, and manual segmentation approaches. The method was tested and validated in a dataset of 178 scans and included segmentation validation (n = 103) and clinical application (n = 132) in individuals with motor neuron disease. We show that people with speech and swallowing deficits tend to have smaller muscle volumes and present a normalisation strategy that removes confounding demographic factors, enabling broader application to large MRI datasets. As the tongue is generally covered in neuroimaging protocols, our multi-contrast pipeline will allow for the post-hoc analysis of a vast number of datasets. We expect this work to enable the investigation of tongue muscle morphology as a marker in a wide range of diseases that implicate tongue function, including neurodegenerative diseases and pathological speech disorders.

Persistent high levels of perceived fatigue are not associated with hypermetabolism in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Journal: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration
Year: March 01, 2025
Authors: Lauren Buckett, Cory Holdom, Stephanie Howe, Pamela Mccombe, Robert Henderson, Ammar Al Chalabi, Frederik Steyn, Shyuan Ngo

Description:Objective: Fatigue is a common symptom in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Little is known about factors that contribute to fatigue, and whether levels of fatigue change throughout disease course. We aimed to determine associations between self-reported perceived fatigue and metabolic and clinical features of ALS, and perceived fatigue over the course of disease. Methods: This prospective study was conducted between July 2017 and March 2024. Baseline measures of self-reported perceived fatigue, metabolic rate, and clinical measures of disease were assessed in 117 participants with clinically definite or probable ALS. For comparison, fatigue and metabolic rate were collected from 107 control participants. Perceived fatigue was determined using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Metabolic rate was assessed using indirect calorimetry. Functional capacity and clinical progression were assessed using the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Results: Baseline levels of perceived fatigue were greater in people living with ALS (plwALS) when compared to controls (5.44 vs. 2.55; p < 0.01). Perceived fatigue was higher in plwALS with lower ALSFRS-R scores and was not associated with measures of metabolism. For most plwALS, perceived fatigue remained high as functional capacity worsened. Conclusion: Our findings confirm higher prevalence of perceived fatigue in plwALS, with persistently high FSS scores reported by most patients during follow-up. High levels of fatigue were not associated with hypermetabolism, suggesting that metabolic rate is unlikely to be a primary contributor. Results highlight a need for further research to identify factors that contribute to fatigue in ALS, and options for improved fatigue management.

Personalized federated learning for predicting disability progression in multiple sclerosis using real-world routine clinical data.

Journal: NPJ Digital Medicine
Year: February 13, 2025
Authors: Ashkan Pirmani, Edward De Brouwer, Ádám Arany, Martijn Oldenhof, Antoine Passemiers, Axel Faes, Tomas Kalincik, Serkan Ozakbas, Riadh Gouider, Barbara Willekens, Dana Horakova, Eva Havrdova, Francesco Patti, Alexandre Prat, Alessandra Lugaresi, Valentina Tomassini, Pierre Grammond, Elisabetta Cartechini, Izanne Roos, Cavit Boz, Raed Alroughani, Maria Amato, Katherine Buzzard, Jeannette Lechner Scott, Joana Guimarães, Claudio Solaro, Oliver Gerlach, Aysun Soysal, Jens Kuhle, Jose Sanchez Menoyo, Daniele Spitaleri, Tunde Csepany, Bart Van Wijmeersch, Radek Ampapa, Julie Prevost, Samia Khoury, Vincent Van Pesch, Nevin John, Davide Maimone, Bianca Weinstock Guttman, Guy Laureys, Pamela Mccombe, Yolanda Blanco, Ayse Altintas, Abdullah Al Asmi, Justin Garber, Anneke Van Der Walt, Helmut Butzkueven, Koen De Gans, Csilla Rozsa, Bruce Taylor, Talal Al Harbi, Attila Sas, Cecilia Rajda, Orla Gray, Danny Decoo, William Carroll, Allan Kermode, Marzena Fabis Pedrini, Deborah Mason, Angel Perez Sempere, Mihaela Simu, Neil Shuey, Bhim Singhal, Marija Cauchi, Todd Hardy, Sudarshini Ramanathan, Patrice Lalive, Carmen-adella Sirbu, Stella Hughes, Tamara Castillo Trivino, Liesbet Peeters, Yves Moreau

Description:Early prediction of disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains challenging despite its critical importance for therapeutic decision-making. We present the first systematic evaluation of personalized federated learning (PFL) for 2-year MS disability progression prediction, leveraging multi-center real-world data from over 26,000 patients. While conventional federated learning (FL) enables privacy-aware collaborative modeling, it remains vulnerable to institutional data heterogeneity. PFL overcomes this challenge by adapting shared models to local data distributions without compromising privacy. We evaluated two personalization strategies: a novel AdaptiveDualBranchNet architecture with selective parameter sharing, and personalized fine-tuning of global models, benchmarked against centralized and client-specific approaches. Baseline FL underperformed relative to personalized methods, whereas personalization significantly improved performance, with personalized FedProx and FedAVG achieving ROC-AUC scores of 0.8398 ± 0.0019 and 0.8384 ± 0.0014, respectively. These findings establish personalization as critical for scalable, privacy-aware clinical prediction models and highlight its potential to inform earlier intervention strategies in MS and beyond.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplant versus immune-reconstitution therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Journal: Brain : A Journal Of Neurology
Authors: Tomas Kalincik, Sifat Sharmin, Izanne Roos, Mark Freedman, Harold Atkins, Jennifer Massey, Ian Sutton, Barbara Withers, Joachim Burman, Øivind Torkildsen, Lars Bø, Anne Lehmann, Eva Havrdova, Eva Krasulova, Marek Trneny, Tomas Kozak, Richard Macdonell, J William Brown, Alasdair Coles, Anneke Van Der Walt, Helmut Butzkueven, Bart Van Wijmeersch, Jeannette Lechner Scott, Michael Barnett, Guy Laureys, Barbara Willekens, Katherine Buzzard, Olga Skibina, Maria Di Gregorio, Suzanne Hodgkinson, Serkan Ozakbas, Jose Meca Lallana, Raed Alroughani, Julie Prevost, Matteo Foschi, Andrea Surcinelli, Stefano Neri, Sara Eichau, Pamela Mccombe, Nevin John, Simón Cárdenas Robledo, Jiwon Oh, Jose Sanchez Menoyo, Francesco Patti, Oliver Gerlach, Yolanda Blanco, Pierre Grammond, Basil Sharrack, John Snowden
Publisher: January 09, 2025

Description:In the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant and immune-reconstitution therapies show several similarities. These treatment strategies have not yet been compared head-to-head. This study emulated pairwise trials of comparative effectiveness of stem cell transplant vs. immune-reconstitution therapies cladribine and alemtuzumab. This cohort/registry study of comparative treatment effectiveness included data from 7 specialist multiple sclerosis centres with autologous hematopoietic stem cell programs (RESCUE-MS) and international MSBase registry during 2006-2023. The study included patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, cladribine or alemtuzumab, with a minimum of 2-month follow-up before commencing study therapy and ≥2 disability assessments after commencing the study therapy. Patients were matched on a propensity score derived from their clinical and demographic characteristics. The matched groups were compared on annualised relapse rates freedom from relapses and 6-month confirmed disability worsening and improvement (measured with Expanded Disability Status Scale). The matching of 143 (stem cell) to 283 cladribine-treated patients and of 134 (stem cell) to 562 alemtuzumab-treated patients reduced the measured differences between the groups by 98% and 96%, respectively. The matched patients had high mean disease activity (>0.8 relapses in the prior 2 years), mean Expanded Disability Status Scale scores of 3-4, and were followed-up for a mean of 3.8-3.9 (stem cell), 1.9 (cladribine) or 4.5 years (alemtuzumab). Compared to cladribine, stem cell transplant was associated with a lower risk of relapses (mean annualised relapse rate ± standard deviation 0.05±0.28 vs. 0.16±0.39, respectively; hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.41), similar risk of disability worsening (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.34-1.43) and higher probability of disability improvement (hazard ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval 1.31-3.66). Compared to alemtuzumab, stem cell transplant was associated with a lower risk of relapses (mean annualised relapse rate ± standard deviation 0.04±0.23 vs. 0.09±0.21, respectively; hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.93), similar risk of disability worsening (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.72) and higher probability of disability improvement (hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.23-3.34). 34% of patients treated with stem cell transplant experienced delayed complications, mainly infections. No treatment-associated deaths were reported. Among patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and moderate disability, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant is superior to cladribine and alemtuzumab at suppressing relapses and enabling recovery of neurological function. The high effectiveness of stem cell transplant is likely attributable to a complex interplay of immune suppression and reconstitution.

Frequently Asked Questions About Pamela A. Mccombe

What conditions does Pamela A. McCombe specialize in treating as a neurologist?

Pamela A. McCombe specializes in treating a wide range of neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, migraines, and neuropathy.

What diagnostic tests does Pamela A. McCombe commonly use in her practice?

Pamela A. McCombe commonly uses diagnostic tests such as MRI scans, CT scans, EEGs, nerve conduction studies, and lumbar punctures to help diagnose and manage neurological conditions.

What treatment options does Pamela A. McCombe offer for neurological disorders?

Pamela A. McCombe offers a variety of treatment options including medication management, physical therapy, Botox injections for migraines, deep brain stimulation for movement disorders, and lifestyle modifications.

How can patients schedule an appointment with Pamela A. McCombe?

Patients can schedule an appointment with Pamela A. McCombe by contacting her office directly or through a referral from their primary care physician or another healthcare provider.

What should patients do to prepare for their first appointment with Pamela A. McCombe?

Patients should bring their medical history, a list of current medications, any relevant imaging or test results, and a list of questions or concerns to discuss with Pamela A. McCombe during their first appointment.

What should patients do if they have an urgent concern related to their neurological condition outside of office hours?

If patients have an urgent concern related to their neurological condition outside of office hours, they should follow the instructions provided by Pamela A. McCombe's office for contacting the on-call physician or seek care at the nearest emergency department.

More Neurologist Like Pamela A. Mccombe in Brisbane

Toparrow