Topical Dorzolamide for Macular Holes: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial-Response.
Description:We thank Abihaidar et al. for their insightful comments [1] on our study [2], which are discussed below. Abihaider et al. suggested a primary endpoint of 12-16 weeks. There is evidence to support surgical intervention for full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) within 3 months to optimise anatomical and visual acuity outcomes. Most spontaneous clo-sures are observed within 3 months, while the risk of FTMH progression increases around this time [3]. While more recent evidence suggests FTMH closure may occur up to 13 weeks with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs), this data was unavailable during our study period [4]. As all patients were consented for surgery by the third month, extending the study period may have risked adverse outcomes for the participants. The patient (Number 10) referred to by Abihaider et al. [1] continued to re-port subjective metamorphopsia and central blurring vision de spite closure of the hole, which warranted proceeding to surgical intervention by week 12 as per the study protocol. We agree that future RCTs could consider extending the study period to 12 or 16 weeks to investigate the efficacy of CAIs. Additional data regarding the staging of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and epiretinal membrane location and epi-centres were important aspects raised by Abihaider et al. [1].Closure with topical therapy was observed in 2 of the 11 stage4 PVD cases (1 dorzolamide group. 1 placebo group), 3 of the 12 stage 3 PVD cases (2 dorzolamide group, 1 placebo group)and 1 of the 9 stage 2 PVD cases (placebo group) (see Table 1).The staging of PVD in our data did not seem to correlate withhigher or lower rates of closure with topical dorzolamidetherapy [2]. Vitreomacular traction (VMT) was present in seven cases, none of which underwent hole closure with topical therapy (three dor zolamide group, four placebo group). Our data supported that FTMH with an additional tractional component in its pathology (as in VMT) is less likely to close spontaneously or with topical dorzolamide therapy (zero of seven cases) [2]. Only three eyes in each group had epiretinal membrane, which were all macular in location. The numbers were too small to comment on the effect of ERM epicentre on this. Furthermore, there is no agreed grading of ERM in the setting of a FTMH, so this was not further elaborated. Duration of FTMH symptoms was only available for 15 of 32 cases (average of 8.44 weeks) [2]. Thus, it was difficult to include this for analysis too. Future clinical trials with larger numbers may provide more analyses on the impact of these factors. We investigated the efficacy of topical dorzolamide on stage 2 FTMH as per Gass classification system, defined as FTMH less than 400 µm. Our reasoning for this patient selection was to further evaluate the findings of Su et al.; a case series of 4 FTMH <300µm that underwent closure with topical dorzol-amide therapy [5]. We agree that investigation of small holes, as defined in the International Vitreomacular Traction Study, would be a worthwhile endeavour.









